+1

2009/1/21 Manfred Geiler <[email protected]>

> +1
>
> --Manfred
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 22:04, Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hey community,
> >
> > Oracle is trying to open up a new JSR for the Portlet 2.0 Bridge.
> >  Originally this was part of the JSR-301 but there was a slight
> > misunderstanding of the intentions of the specs regarding release dates.
>  To
> > make a long story short, instead of doing both the specifications for
> > Portlet 1.0 and 2.0 as part of the JSR, it's being split up.  The Project
> > lead will be Michael Freedman who is a MyFaces committer and has been
> very
> > active on the Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge project and he was also the
> > spec-lead for the JSR-301.  The Apache implementations of these
> > specifications are being written as the eventual R.I.'s for the bridge
> > projects.
> >
> > In any case, should Apache MyFaces put its vote in for the formation of
> this
> > JSR?  Understand that this is not a vote for a project or spec, just to
> > allow the JCP to start a JSR to support this project.  I have gotten word
> > from Apache that this can be done if a community decides to support it.
> >  Since the Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge is being developed as the
> eventual
> > R.I. and Oracle has been very open to aiding the OpenSource development
> of
> > this bridge here at Apache, I think it's a good opportunity for us to
> > support the JCP and, in particular, the Portlet Bridge Projects.
> >
> > Vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1 to support the formation of a new JSR for the Portlet Bridge 2.0
> > [ ] +0 don't really care, it's just a silly green checkmark on the ballot
> > [ ] -1 don't put the green checkmark on the ballot, Apache shouldn't
> support
> > the JCP
> >
> > Thanks,
> >  Scott O'Bryan
> >
>

Reply via email to