On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Bruno Aranda <[email protected]> wrote: > Though it is really cool you are doing all this job,
+1 thanks for doing that, werner! > I believe that the way > to go is to do it through JIRA. For instance, I have close to no spare time > for JSF these days but I really enjoying following the development of the > JSF 2.0 implementation through JIRA. I think that offline discussions make > the subject more difficult to understand for the rest and even if the task > is done effectively keeping others from the loop may harm the project when > those who implemented the thing offline cannot help anymore to its > maintenance. People comes and goes, so having in JIRA makes it very > convenient. +1 using jira is more transparent to others. People come and go, good point. I have to second that. > > If it is not possible, I would at least create the JIRA issue containing the > big changes and explaining what it does. At least it will be in the release > notes... yes, that is somewhat feasible for me as well > > Thanks for the work! Yes, right. Werner thanks for the time. Some to Ganesh and Alex! -Matthias > > Bruno > > 2009/4/9 Werner Punz <[email protected]> >> >> Ok I need one exception to this rule. >> I have done a load of work with our combined codebases offline >> and also I am doing a full package reorg as we speak. >> This would mean >> >> a) Either push the entire codebase into the jira (a diff is pointless >> there is almost no file at the same place) >> >> or >> >> b) Doing one commit outside of the jira with references that this is a >> shared codebase >> >> Cheers >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >>> >>> c) >>> that is *the* way to go. >>> The contributors can upload a patch (visible to everybody that is >>> interested) and a committer is free to take it and move it over >>> to the source code. Also this way allows a much better feedback >>> process... >>> >>> a) and b) imply too much offline work... >>> exchanging patches behind hidden doors is not the way that a good and >>> intact community wants to go. >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Werner Punz <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> I just got the last ICLA confirmation missing, now following. >>>> We are still at work, ganesh and alex are working on their codebase, >>>> since they do not have committer rights we have to do some workflow >>>> adjustment. >>>> >>>> I would propose following: >>>> >>>> >>>> a) I am working today and tomorrow still on the combined codebase >>>> cleanup, >>>> and will commit tomorrow my codebase into the ASF repo! >>>> >>>> b) Alex and Ganesh can work on theirs, Either I fetch the changes myself >>>> and commit them with acknowlegdgement >>>> >>>> or >>>> >>>> c) We go the jira route, which personally is for me the way which causes >>>> more work because I constantly have to apply patches instead! >>>> >>>> I personally would vote for b) what is the consensous on this? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
