c) that is *the* way to go. The contributors can upload a patch (visible to everybody that is interested) and a committer is free to take it and move it over to the source code. Also this way allows a much better feedback process...
a) and b) imply too much offline work... exchanging patches behind hidden doors is not the way that a good and intact community wants to go. -Matthias On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Werner Punz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello > > I just got the last ICLA confirmation missing, now following. > We are still at work, ganesh and alex are working on their codebase, > since they do not have committer rights we have to do some workflow > adjustment. > > I would propose following: > > > a) I am working today and tomorrow still on the combined codebase cleanup, > and will commit tomorrow my codebase into the ASF repo! > > b) Alex and Ganesh can work on theirs, Either I fetch the changes myself > and commit them with acknowlegdgement > > or > > c) We go the jira route, which personally is for me the way which causes > more work because I constantly have to apply patches instead! > > I personally would vote for b) what is the consensous on this? > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
