not sure why this has been resent, but here is my originally post... http://markmail.org/message/iblbbuxihdx4s53b
-M On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Simon Lessard <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Jeanne Waldman <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> +1 to the name >> Is everyone ok with trinidadinternal plus a comment staying it is private >> being enough to make this 'private' so that we are free to remove it and/or >> change the default behavior after it has been tested long enough? >> I'm ok with it. >> >> Here's a link to the JIRA issue: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1442 >> >> Jeanne >> >> Korhan Bircan wrote, On 5/11/2009 4:07 PM PT: >> >> Hello, >> >> To implement Trinidad-1442 "Aggregate single image to send to client" I >> need a new context parameter to turn the feature on and off in case there >> are any bugs early on. I want to make it private and remove it once the >> feature is fully tested. If the feature works properly it will help >> performance and should always be on. >> >> Currently I'm using a parameter in web.xml called >> "org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.ENABLE_IMAGE_AGGREGATION". What do you >> think about this? >> >> The affected files are: >> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.style.cache.FileSystemStyleCache.java >> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.style.cache.ImageStrip.java (new) >> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.style.cache.ImageStripIcon.java (new) >> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.style.cache.ImageStripUtils.java (new) >> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.style.util.CSSGenerationUtils.java >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Korhan >> 650.506.7786 > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
