On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Werner Punz <[email protected]> wrote: > Ganesh schrieb: >> >> Hi, >> >> yes, sure, declarative languages have more limitations then procedural >> ones and sometimes we must swich to the procedural backup and again yes I >> think it it is worth working on "something like that". >> >> IMHO we should first of all discuss the basis we want to work upon. Which >> are your reasons to prefer starting with jQuery instead of dojo? Here's my >> list of reasons why I chose dojo: >> >> - better industry support >> - larger widget base >> - more of a hype right now (seems to me ...) >> > Actually the thing is following. > We should not nail ourselves down to just one libary. > > Ganesh you have dojo pretty well covered für facelets only, why dont we > use your lib as starting point and add other widget sets libraries. > > YUI comes to my mind! > I personally think the future does not lie in one widget set dojo has severe > bugs in the dijit departement which are hard to come by if you > have no experience, we should broaden our scope. > > YUI is so close to dojo that we probably can support it as well, jQuery I do > not know. > Since we are on facelets things are way easier than with a standard > component model!
+1 IMO facelets allows really quick/rapid development cycles ... -M > > > > Werner > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
