Hi, in the thread "slf4j and myfaces" was a possible Problem mentioned:
>> What I'm not sure is >> if the "JUL to other logging impl bridge" is multiple application >> friendly. What happens if the JUL root handler is replaced (thats what >> these bridges seem to do). Does this influence the servlet container >> logging and other apps as well? > >Seems to be true, JUL is not container friendly by default. But this needs to >be addressed by the container (and the Java Spec guys ;-) ). >It seems, this is the reason for JULI, the Tomcat logging impl. >Also JBoss solved that (as they use Tomcat ?!). See for a documentation here: > >http://www.jboss.org/file-access/default/members/jbossweb/freezone/docs/latest/logging.html > >They replace the LogManager by a container friendly LogManager. The JUL using >app does not need to know that. what about the other containers (WebSphere, WebLogic, ...)? For tobago this can be an option only if all relevant containers do something to support this. (sorry, to busy to research this myself) Regards, Volker 2009/6/10 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>: >>> it's a binding vote for the next releases of all myfaces libs which are > > ok, that answers my question. > >>> currently using commons-logging. >>> so e.g. trinidad isn't affected. details are available at [1] >>> >>> if there won't be a majority, we will open a second vote (switch from >>> commons-logging to slf4j). >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------ >>> [ ] +1 for replacing cl with jul >>> [ ] +0 >>> [X] -1 for keeping cl or to force a second vote for slf4j as replacement >>> ------------------------------------------------ > > For Trinidad, we keep our Trinidad logger (at least I am not chaning that). > The TrinidadLogger is internally using JUL, for what's worth. So I think > we are fine with that, at least I hope... > > For core I am totally fine in using JUL, but for some reasons I don't like > the corporate-ish voting style to force all the other sub-projects. > (read: if tobago want's to use slf4j, why not ?) > > I think I will keep my +0.75 vote :-) > But I am also for a more liberal debate, if some project (-> Tobago) > want to use slf4j... > > Just my 2cents... > > -M > >>> >>> regards, >>> gerhard >>> >>> [1] http://www.nabble.com/slf4j-and-myfaces-td23890255.html >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- inexso - information exchange solutions GmbH Bismarckstraße 13 | 26122 Oldenburg Tel.: +49 441 4082 356 | FAX: +49 441 4082 355 | www.inexso.de
