On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Ganesh<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Is this an invalid veto?
maybe. not sure if pushing this is healthy for the community too. If he wants to not use jul, it is OK w/ me... > >>> To prevent vetos from being used capriciously, they must be accompanied >>> by a technical justification showing why the change is bad (opens a security >>> exposure, negatively affects performance, /etc./). A veto without a >>> justification is invalid and has no weight. << >>> (http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto) > > Best regards, > Ganesh > > Bernd Bohmann schrieb: >> >> +1 away from commons logging >> -1 force to use jul >> >> I would prefer slf4j because it's a logging facade similar to commons >> logging. >> >> And I would like to use Mapped Diagnostic Context (MDC) support. Has >> jul a similar feature? >> >> Regards >> >> Bernd >> >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Andrew >> Robinson<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> +0, I'd prefer slf4j as well. But, I am +1 of getting away from >>> commons logging as it has too many issues. >>> >>> -Andrew >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Werner Punz<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> For Trinidad, we keep our Trinidad logger (at least I am not chaning >>>>> that). >>>>> The TrinidadLogger is internally using JUL, for what's worth. So I >>>>> think >>>>> we are fine with that, at least I hope... >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> I dont think anything has to be changed on the Trinidad side in this >>>> regard. >>>> The biggest reason for using jul was get rid of another dependency, if >>>> Trinidad has anothe meta logger on top of JUL I personally thing not a >>>> single line of code has to be changed. >>>> Just my 2c! >>>> >>>> >>>> Werner >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
