Hi Jeanne,

Thanks for the information, the thing is the custom resource loader is
able to locate resource files in custom location, but the main entry
point it is still the resource servlet, which intercepts the request
to a /adf/* and then delegates to various resource loader to actually
locate them, right?

I was thinking maybe there is a feature like you can have EL
expressions in the css, to resolve the context where the resource
servlet is mapped...

For now we will stick with the default /adf, i think this mapping of
the resource servlet is required by other trinidad stuff also...so
it's like a best practice to have it declared in web.xml.

regards,
Catalin

On 1/13/10, Jeanne Waldman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote, On 1/12/2010 11:57 PM PT:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Catalin Kormos
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Was wondering if it would be possible to package a skin in its own jar
>>> file,
>>>
>>
>> yes, put the skinning xml/cfg in the JAR_FILE.jar/META-INF/
>>
>>
>>>
>>> so that we wouldn't need to package the skin witht the actual webapp that
>>> uses it, so that we could start having separate modules for skins?
>>>
>>
>> in theory yes.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> it would
>>> make sense for the new Casablanca skin IMHO. What do you think?
>>>
>>
>> I think we should make the new Casablance skin the default;
>> the old skin we can place into a "skinning module"
>>
>> /trinidad-skins
>>  -/old-and-ugly-green-skin
>> :-)
>>
>>
>>>
>>> About packaging skins, it seems possible, but I have a question:
>>>   - for example in the skin's css file, if background image urls are
>>> specified, for example, with a property "background: white
>>> url(/adf/skins/casablanca/images/backgrounds/buttonLikeHeadHover.png)
>>> repeat-x bottom left;" this will work also when the images are packaged
>>> in a
>>> jar available in the classpath, but only if the Trinidad Resource Servlet
>>> is
>>> mapped to /adf/*; what happens if the servlet is mapped to another url
>>> pattern? is there another approach, mapping independent, or are we stuck
>>> with /adf?
>>>
>>
>> I think we are stuck with the (odd) /adf
>>
>> Regarding its refactoring, I think it takes quite a while and maybe
>> error-prone.
>> Jeanne may know more on that item.
>>
>
> I would stick with /adf in your path since that is the easiest.
>
> If you want to use a different mapping, say /foo, then you probably have to
> do this (I haven't confirmed):
> 1. add a new foo.resources file to \META-INF\servlets\resources directory
>   - currently there is an adf.resources file and it has this one entry
> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.resource.CoreRenderKitResourceLoader
> 2. add your new mapping to Trinidad's ResourceServlet to the web.xml.
>  - currently there is:
>   <servlet-mapping>
>     <servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
>     <url-pattern>/adf/*</url-pattern>
>   </servlet-mapping>
> 3. I don't think there are dependencies on /adf in any of Trinidad's
> ResourceLoaders, but if so, then you'll need to write your own
> ResourceLoader as well.
>
>
>>
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>>
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Catalin
>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Catalin Kormos
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok, sounds good.
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Cata
>>>>
>>>> On 1/8/10, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> once the JIRA is up, I will ping [email protected] regarding the
>>>>> software grant
>>>>> Note: this is only discussed at the incubator committee, but no
>>>>> incubation for that piece is
>>>>> needed. Maybe (only) a software grant.
>>>>>
>>>>> -M
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Catalin Kormos
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey Matthias,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Great :), we'll look into the tasks you mentioned.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>> Catalin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/8/10, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Catalin et al,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> as promised, I hijacked the thread...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks again for contributing this skin to Trinidad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The following tasks are needed:
>>>>>>> -A JIRA ticket that contains the patch(es)
>>>>>>>  - for the Skin itself
>>>>>>>  - for the GREAT demo
>>>>>>> => maybe a software grant is needed; If so, I will handle the
>>>>>>> paperwork stuff for you guys.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Once the things above are sorted out, we can apply it to TRUNK.
>>>>>>> However, I'd like to do a RELEASE before we integrate the new
>>>>>>> Skin/Demo.
>>>>>>> I also don't mind to pretty much do a "sub-release" once the new
>>>>>>> stuff
>>>>>>> is in. (With maven, release are not expensive)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Catalin Kormos
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello there,
>>>>>>>> I have the pleasure to inform you about the work we did to develop a
>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>> skin for Trinidad and based on this a brand new, Trinidad components
>>>>>>>> showcase application. You can see it all in action at [1]. It is
>>>>>>>> still a
>>>>>>>> working in progress, in advanced state though...i mean there is
>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>> something to be improved; nevertheless we would like to donate the
>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>> skin
>>>>>>>> and the new demo application to the MyFaces community, in its
>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>> state,
>>>>>>>> and continue there if you guys agree.
>>>>>>>> Many thanks go to my collegue Adonis who has put a lot of effort
>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>> designing and implementing the new skin called 'Casablanca'. I'm
>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>> he
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> give you more details as needed about how the process went.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A few words about the new demo:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  first of all, many thanks to another collegue of mine, Cosmin, for
>>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>>> continuos efforts with this.
>>>>>>>> the demo is working only with facelets (there is no jsp version)
>>>>>>>> it uses the latest 1.2.13-SNAPSHOT version of Trinidad
>>>>>>>> we tryied to build it so it can be searched online also, currently
>>>>>>>> tryied
>>>>>>>> with Google Custom Search, but this didn't work out so smoothly so
>>>>>>>> far.
>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>> any case, that's the reason for the pretty urls used. (so, no point
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> trying the search currently as it doesn't work).
>>>>>>>> in general, it replicates the examples available already for
>>>>>>>> Trinidad
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> existing demo, in someplaces slightly improved.
>>>>>>>> it tryies to provide a platform on which to build much more demos as
>>>>>>>> required as there can be always new ideas about demoing a
>>>>>>>> meaningfull
>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>> case on Trinidad, or some component behaviour.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm eager to get your reactions, I think these guys did a great job
>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>> far
>>>>>>>> and this would bring Trinidad at least a few steps closer to a more
>>>>>>>> appealing and user friendly component set.
>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>> Catalin
>>>>>>>> [1] http://example.irian.at/trinidad-showcase-casablanca
>>>>>>>> ------------
>>>>>>>> Codebeat
>>>>>>>> www.codebeat.ro
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ------------
>>>>>> Codebeat
>>>>>> www.codebeat.ro
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ------------
>>>> Codebeat
>>>> www.codebeat.ro
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ------------
>>> Codebeat
>>> www.codebeat.ro
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>


-- 
------------
Codebeat
www.codebeat.ro

Reply via email to