2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger <[email protected]> > At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting thread? > > By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long > as they are appropriately documented. > > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b > > So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure, right?
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > Those files were copied from tomcat project: > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/ > > > > There is no mention in NOTICE file there. > > > > regards, > > > > Leonardo Uribe > > > > 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann <[email protected]> > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> the geronimo project includes these file as well. See: > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE > >> > >> Maybe we should follow with the same procedure. > >> > >> Any suggestions? > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Bernd > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are we > >> > even > >> > allowed to bundle them? > >> > Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error made > on > >> > Bernds side. > >> > > >> > > >> > Werner > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe: > >> >> > >> >> Hi Bernd > >> >> > >> >> All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can > >> >> continue with the vote. > >> >> > >> >> regards, > >> >> > >> >> Leonardo Uribe > >> >> > >> >> 2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann <[email protected] > >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> >> > >> >> Hello, > >> >> > >> >> here is my > >> >> > >> >> -1 > >> >> > >> >> I found too many files without or old apache license header. > >> >> j4fry is missing in the notice file. > >> >> > >> >> The files > >> >> > >> >> > core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd > >> >> are cddl and are missing in the notice file > >> >> > >> >> I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the > 2.0.1 > >> >> branch. > >> >> > >> >> Regards > >> >> > >> >> Bernd > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg < > [email protected] > >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> >> > +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build > >> >> them from the source distribution. > >> >> > > >> >> > LieGrue, > >> >> > strub > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe <[email protected] > >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]>> > >> >> > Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1 > >> >> > To: "MyFaces Development" <[email protected] > >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> >> > Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM > >> >> > > >> >> > Hi, > >> >> > > >> >> > I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of > Apache > >> >> > MyFaces core out. > >> >> > > >> >> > The artifacts passed all TCK tests. > >> >> > > >> >> > Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts: > >> >> > 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v4.0.2 > [1] > >> >> > > >> >> > 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v2.0.1 [1] > >> >> > 3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.test" > v1.0.0-beta-4 > >> >> [1] > >> >> > > >> >> > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] > and > >> >> [3] for binary and source packages). > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > The release notes could be found at [4]. > >> >> > > >> >> > Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with > >> >> myfaces-api. > >> >> > > >> >> > Please take a look at the "2.0.1" artifacts and vote! > >> >> > > >> >> > Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of > >> >> three > >> >> > > >> >> > +1 votes (see [3]). > >> >> > > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------ > >> >> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > >> >> > [ ] +0 > >> >> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be > >> >> released, > >> >> > > >> >> > and why.............. > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------ > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > Leonardo Uribe > >> >> > > >> >> > [1] > >> >> http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201<http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201> > >> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201> > >> >> > > >> >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes > >> >> > [3] > >> >> http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc<http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc> > >> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc> > >> >> > > >> >> > [4] > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> < > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117 > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
