Hello Mike, can you define appropriately documented. Should we add a section to the notice file?
Regards Bernd On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[email protected]> wrote: > At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting thread? > > By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long > as they are appropriately documented. > > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi >> >> Those files were copied from tomcat project: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/ >> >> There is no mention in NOTICE file there. >> >> regards, >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann <[email protected]> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> the geronimo project includes these file as well. See: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE >>> >>> Maybe we should follow with the same procedure. >>> >>> Any suggestions? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Bernd >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are we >>> > even >>> > allowed to bundle them? >>> > Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error made on >>> > Bernds side. >>> > >>> > >>> > Werner >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe: >>> >> >>> >> Hi Bernd >>> >> >>> >> All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can >>> >> continue with the vote. >>> >> >>> >> regards, >>> >> >>> >> Leonardo Uribe >>> >> >>> >> 2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann <[email protected] >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> >> >>> >> Hello, >>> >> >>> >> here is my >>> >> >>> >> -1 >>> >> >>> >> I found too many files without or old apache license header. >>> >> j4fry is missing in the notice file. >>> >> >>> >> The files >>> >> >>> >> core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd >>> >> are cddl and are missing in the notice file >>> >> >>> >> I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the 2.0.1 >>> >> branch. >>> >> >>> >> Regards >>> >> >>> >> Bernd >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected] >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >> > +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build >>> >> them from the source distribution. >>> >> > >>> >> > LieGrue, >>> >> > strub >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe <[email protected] >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> >> > Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1 >>> >> > To: "MyFaces Development" <[email protected] >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> >> > Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM >>> >> > >>> >> > Hi, >>> >> > >>> >> > I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache >>> >> > MyFaces core out. >>> >> > >>> >> > The artifacts passed all TCK tests. >>> >> > >>> >> > Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts: >>> >> > 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v4.0.2 [1] >>> >> > >>> >> > 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v2.0.1 [1] >>> >> > 3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.test" v1.0.0-beta-4 >>> >> [1] >>> >> > >>> >> > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and >>> >> [3] for binary and source packages). >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > The release notes could be found at [4]. >>> >> > >>> >> > Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with >>> >> myfaces-api. >>> >> > >>> >> > Please take a look at the "2.0.1" artifacts and vote! >>> >> > >>> >> > Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of >>> >> three >>> >> > >>> >> > +1 votes (see [3]). >>> >> > >>> >> > ------------------------------------------------ >>> >> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits >>> >> > [ ] +0 >>> >> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be >>> >> released, >>> >> > >>> >> > and why.............. >>> >> > ------------------------------------------------ >>> >> > >>> >> > Thanks, >>> >> > Leonardo Uribe >>> >> > >>> >> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201 >>> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201> >>> >> > >>> >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes >>> >> > [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc >>> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc> >>> >> > >>> >> > [4] >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >> >> >
