Hi! 1.) My colleague Bütti fixed a bug today (committed it for him) and I'd like to see this tested by a few others before we go on with the release.
2.) I also like to add ASL headers to all our poms, so our board is happy ;) Hope to get this done in the next 2 days. 3.) What about apache-parent-7 and switching over our release process? I successfully did this for OWB build-tools and currently running the OWB-1.0.0-alpha-1 release, so I can volunteer/guide with the release. LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 7/6/10, Werner Punz <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Werner Punz <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1 > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, July 6, 2010, 4:07 PM > Jepp there were a handful of > showstoppers, most have been fixed (but not > all) > I am glad 2.0.1 did not make it out of the door, this gave > us additional > time to fix the bugs which have crawled up lately. > > > Werner > > > Am 06.07.10 00:48, schrieb Leonardo Uribe: > > Hi > > > > Yes, the vote has been stopped. In the last weeks we > have found some > > issues, so it is necessary to fix them before propose > another release. > > > > regards, > > > > Leonardo Uribe > > > > 2010/7/5 Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > Hi, > > > > I was out for a bit, and was > wondering if this vote has now been > > officially stopped ? > > > > Thanks! > > Matthias > > > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:00 > PM, Leonardo Uribe <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > That's cool! Thanks!. After > release myfaces master pom v 8 I'll > > propose a > > > release of 2.0.1 again. > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Leonardo > > > > > > 2010/6/16 Michael Concini > <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >> > > >> Leonardo, > > >> I just committed the > proper fix for MYFACES-2754 now so as far > > as 2754 and > > >> 2755 we should be good to > go. > > >> > > >> -Mike > > >> On 6/16/2010 1:52 PM, > Leonardo Uribe wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Bernd > > >> > > >> Ok, thanks. Unfortunately > I have to restart all release steps, > > because > > >> there was changes applied > on trunk that should be applied, but > > I'm not have > > >> a separate patch to apply > it (MYFACES-2755, MYFACES-2754 is in > > progress, > > >> TOMAHAWK....). > > >> > > >> We still have an > unresolved problem with myfaces master pom v7 > > (checkstyle > > >> version is snapshot). > Since myfaces core 2.0.x depends on this > > pom and we > > >> don't have response from > Matthias fix this issue, At this point > > I have to > > >> release myfaces master > pom first. > > >> > > >> regards, > > >> > > >> Leonardo Uribe > > >> > > >> 2010/6/16 Bernd Bohmann > <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> > > >>> Hi Leonardo, > > >>> > > >>> thanks a lot. Now it > is ok for me. > > >>> I added some missing > licenses on the 2.0.1 branch. > > >>> > > >>> Regards > > >>> > > >>> Bernd > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 > at 11:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > Hi Bernd > > >>> > > > >>> > I added in api: > > >>> > > > >>> > > META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT > > >>> > > META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT > > >>> > > META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT > > >>> > > > >>> > in impl > > >>> > > > >>> > > META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT > > >>> > > META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT > > >>> > > > >>> > because the > schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar. > > >>> > > > >>> > The update to > NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to > > prevent > > >>> > > misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it. > > >>> > > > >>> > regards, > > >>> > > > >>> > Leonardo Uribe > > >>> > > > >>> > 2010/6/15 Bernd > Bohmann <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Hello > Leonardo, > > >>> >> > > >>> >> looks ok for > me. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Can you also > add in api > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT > > >>> >> > META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT > > >>> >> > META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT > > >>> >> > META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT > > >>> >> > > >>> >> and in impl > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT > > >>> >> > > >>> >> an example > would be > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/ > > >>> >> > > >>> >> I have no > time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow > > >>> >> afternoon. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Regards > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Bernd > > >>> >> > > >>> >> On Tue, Jun > 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> >> wrote: > > >>> >> > Hi > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > I think > the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this: > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > This > product includes software developed by: > > >>> >> > The > Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >>> >> > See the > file LICENSE.txt > > >>> >> > See > licenses for accompanying products in the "/licenses" > > >>> >> > > subdirectory. > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > This > software also includes code from Facelets > > >>> >> > (https://facelets.dev.java.net/) > > >>> >> > for the > purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 > > support. > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > This > product includes schema files developed for the > > Glassfish Java > > >>> >> > EE > > >>> >> > > reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/). > > >>> >> > Apache > Myfaces elects to include this software in this > > distribution > > >>> >> > under > the CDDL license. You can obtain a copy of the > > License at: > > >>> >> > https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html > > >>> >> > The > source code is available at: > > >>> >> > https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/ > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > The > following schemas are included: > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > =========================== > > >>> >> > > javaee_5.xsd > > >>> >> > > javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd > > >>> >> > > =========================== > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > If no > comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all > > >>> >> > > artifacts and > > >>> >> > start > vote again. > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > regards, > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > Leonardo Uribe > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > 2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Ok, > let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can > > >>> >> >> > regenerate > > >>> >> >> > (again) the artifacts. > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> To > prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose > > another vote > > >>> >> >> > and > > >>> >> >> > after that wait another 72 hours for release. > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> >> >>> > The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an > > issue. > > >>> >> >>> > And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release > > using > > >>> >> >>> > this vote. > > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> >> >>> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe > > >>> >> >>> > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> >> >>> > wrote: > > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>> >> >>> > > 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> At this point, should this discussion be moved out > of the > > >>> >> >>> > >> voting > > >>> >> >>> > >> thread? > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd > spec > > files, so > > >>> >> >>> > >> long > > >>> >> >>> > >> as they are appropriately documented. > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>> >> >>> > > So we can close this vote and continue the release > > procedure, > > >>> >> >>> > > right? > > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe > > >>> >> >>> > >> <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> >> >>> > >> wrote: > > >>> >> >>> > >> > Hi > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> > Those files were copied from tomcat project: > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > > > >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/ > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> > There is no mention in NOTICE file there. > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> > regards, > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> > Leonardo Uribe > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> > 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> Hello, > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> the geronimo project includes these file > as well. See: > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> Maybe we should follow with the same > procedure. > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> Any suggestions? > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> Regards > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> Bernd > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner > Punz > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> wrote: > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but > since both > > files are > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > CDDL > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > are > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > we > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > even > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > allowed to bundle them? > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > Or are both clear due to > reimplementation and > > this was an > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > error > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > made > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > on > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > Bernds side. > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > Werner > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo > Uribe: > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> Hi Bernd > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> All artifacts has been > regenerated, to include > > your fix, > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> so we > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> can > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> continue with the vote. > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> regards, > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> Leonardo Uribe > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> 2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> <mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>>> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> Hello, > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> here is my > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> -1 > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> I found too many > files without or old apache > > license > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> header. > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> j4fry is missing in > the notice file. > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> The files > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> are cddl and are > missing in the notice file > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> I have tried to fix > some of the errors in > > the trunk > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> and in > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> the > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> 2.0.1 > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> branch. > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> Regards > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> Bernd > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 > at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> <mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>>> > wrote: > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > +0 the artifacts look good > so far, but I was not > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> able to > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> build > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> them from the source > distribution. > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > LieGrue, > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > strub > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > --- On Fri, 6/11/10, > Leonardo Uribe > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> <mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>>> > wrote: > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> <mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>>> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > Subject: [VOTE] release for > myfaces core 2.0.1 > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > To: "MyFaces Development" > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> <mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>>> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, > 7:06 PM > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > Hi, > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > I was running the needed > tasks to get the 2.0.1 > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> release of > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> Apache > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > MyFaces core out. > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > The artifacts passed all TCK > tests. > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > Please note that this vote > concerns all of the > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> following > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> parts: > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > 1. Maven artifact > group > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> "org.apache.myfaces.shared" > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> v4.0.2 > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> [1] > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > 2. Maven artifact > group > > "org.apache.myfaces.core" > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> v2.0.1 > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> [1] > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > 3. Maven artifact > group > > "org.apache.myfaces.test" > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> v1.0.0-beta-4 > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> [1] > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > The artifacts are deployed > to my private Apache > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> account > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> ([1] > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> and > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> [3] for binary and > source packages). > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > The release notes could be > found at [4]. > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > Also the clirr test does not > show binary > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> incompatibilities > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> with > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> myfaces-api. > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > Please take a look at the > "2.0.1" artifacts and > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> vote! > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > Please note: This vote is > "majority approval" > > with > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> a > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> minimum > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> of > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> three > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > +1 votes (see [3]). > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------ > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > [ ] +1 for community members > who have > > reviewed the > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> bits > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > [ ] +0 > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that > should cause > > these bits > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> not to > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> be > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> released, > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > and why.............. > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------ > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > Thanks, > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > Leonardo Uribe > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > [1] > > http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201 > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > [2] > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > [3] > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > [4] > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117 > > > ><http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > ><http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117 > > > ><http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117>> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > > >>> >> >>> > >> > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > >
