On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Martin Marinschek <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Matthias, > >> Not everybody is using CDI and/or Spring. > > well, in the real world and a little while in the future, there is not > many people who will not have one of these frameworks in their > applications. > >> I think, on long term we may want one clean and independent API, where >> all these projects offer an implementation for a window/event system: >> -CODI >> -Orchestra >> -Trinidad >> -etc >> >> However, right now, Trinidad has the base already and adding a new >> toolset to the belt feels kinda wrong. >> Again +1 on this to be inside of Trinidad. >> >> This does not mean that we could work on a better future version of a >> more unified API, for this. Right? > > yes, this is what we could and what we should. Why not take this > addition as a reason to do this right now? If we don´t take such > additions as a reason to do this, what else will be our reason?
It could be done in parallel, right? I have not said it we can never address this ;-) > > best regards, > > Martin > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
