+1 of removing this, the info is in svn anyway, why duplicate it?
Werner Am 09.08.10 21:43, schrieb Jan-Kees van Andel:
Hi, What do you guys think about pruning the SVN keywords in the source files? Matthias pointed out a nice example of an issue you run into with this stuff. 1 Not everybody has (the same) svn:keywords on every file. 2 When 1, it will get out of sync. 3 Unreadable version numbers are pretty useless information (at least for me). 4 If you need to know something about the revision history, SVN itself is a much better place to look. 5 (I think) it looks messy in the source code. Note that I'm not talking about removing everything in a major refactoring. For now, I'm just proposing a convention for new code. I'm also not proposing to remove the @author JavaDoc tag. That's a useful one. I'm talking about the "latest modification by $Author" and "@version $Revision: 799929 $ $Date:.......$" stuff. What do you guys think? Regards, Jan-Kees 2010/8/9 Jan-Kees van Andel <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Yeah, I know. I'm so quick. I can edit files back in time. ;-) /JK 2010/8/9 Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> + * @author Leonardo Uribe (latest modification by $Author: jankeesvanandel $) + * @version $Revision: 799929 $ $Date: 2009-08-01 16:29:33 -0500 (sáb, 01 ago 2009) $ did you copy that into your IDE template for new files? :-) -M On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi Stan > > I have attached a proposal for this issue on: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2860 > > It includes the patch to be applied on myfaces, the project created to do > the integration, and the jsf deployer used in JBoss AS6 to give a try. > > It could be good to know what do yo think about it. > > best regards, > > Leonardo Uribe > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
