On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Michael Kurz <[email protected]> wrote: > I would also get rid of the author tags too. I guess that in many cases they > are not correct anyway as files are constantly changed.
exactly, and still svn (blame) knows everything... Original committer and who introduced all the bugs ;-) > > Michael > > Am 11.08.2010 08:22, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf: >> >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Bernd Bohmann >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> why we need the @author tag? >>> I don't like code owner ship. >> >> well, some do. I am fine without. In fact a lot of Apache project do so, >> since >> there is no "code-ownership". SVN has still all the information >> >>> >>> Does your request mean we don't allow the svn:keywords=Date Author Id >>> Revision HeadURL >>> in the Subversion config file? >> >> I am sure the talk is *only* inside the Java files, and not removing >> the metadata of the file. >> >> -M >> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Bernd >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Jan-Kees van Andel >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Sure. For example, take a look >>>> at: >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk/api/src/main/java/javax/faces/FacesException.java >>>> If we remove the SVN stuff, we'll end up with this JavaDoc comment: >>>> /** >>>> * see Javadoc of<a >>>> >>>> href="http://java.sun.com/javaee/javaserverfaces/1.2/docs/api/index.html";>JSF >>>> Specification</a> >>>> * >>>> * @author Manfred Geiler >>>> */ >>>> >>>> Or for >>>> example: >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk/api/src/main/java/javax/faces/application/Application.java >>>> This would become: >>>> /** >>>> * ..... >>>> * >>>> * @author Manfred Geiler >>>> * @author Stan Silvert >>>> */ >>>> >>>> One last example, a class added in >>>> 2.0: >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk/api/src/main/java/javax/faces/application/ResourceHandler.java >>>> Which would end up like: >>>> /** >>>> * @author Simon Lessard >>>> * @since 2.0 >>>> */ >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> BTW. I'm thinking of the best way to do this. I guess the best bet is to >>>> do a massive find-replace on one project at a time. Generating a patch >>>> file >>>> would be a nice way to check for possible errors... >>>> Regards, >>>> Jan-Kees >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2010/8/10 Leonardo Uribe<[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> Could you provide an explicit example about how the header of java >>>>> files >>>>> should be? >>>>> >>>>> best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Leonardo >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
