+1 for extra examples. With mercurial, I had already some 'strange' things (like directories not visible in pre-commit list but still commited, ...) but probably better for forking/branching. So no opinion about the technology used.
Regards Rudy. On 18 December 2010 12:21, Werner Punz <[email protected]> wrote: > If we have the choice between svn and Mercurial thesn please go for > Mercurial. Merc is not my personally preferred rcs (which is git) but it is > way better than SVN and a very good RCS. > I think it should be no problem for most people to install Merc and do a > checkout especially since it has better Windows support than GIT. > > > Werner > > Am 18.12.10 11:42, schrieb Gerhard: > > hi @ all, >> >> imo we should host some examples at apache-extras. it would be easier >> for contributors to donate their examples. >> we have the choice between svn and mercurial. the advantage of svn is >> that most contributors are familiar with svn. >> however, with mercurial it's easier for contributors to fork >> the repository and to contribute their examples. moreover, it's easier >> to mirror the repository e.g. to bitbucket which offers more features. >> >> furthermore, it would be nice to have one repository per subproject/topic. >> e.g. myfaces-extval-examples, myfaces-codi-examples, >> myfaces-stacks-examples, ..., myfaces-helpline (for easier communication >> on the users-list) >> that would allow a clear separation concerning the wiki and the issue >> tracker. >> >> -> +1 for mercurial and one repository per subproject/topic. >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> Your JSF powerhouse - >> JSF Consulting, Development and >> Courses in English and German >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> > > >
