Actually after recomparing GIT and mercurial I still think Git is the
better although harder to handle system.
Too bad that Google code does not allow GIT as well.
Werner
Am 20.12.10 10:07, schrieb Rudy De Busscher:
+1 for extra examples.
With mercurial, I had already some 'strange' things (like directories
not visible in pre-commit list but still commited, ...) but probably
better for forking/branching. So no opinion about the technology used.
Regards
Rudy.
On 18 December 2010 12:21, Werner Punz <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If we have the choice between svn and Mercurial thesn please go for
Mercurial. Merc is not my personally preferred rcs (which is git)
but it is way better than SVN and a very good RCS.
I think it should be no problem for most people to install Merc and
do a checkout especially since it has better Windows support than GIT.
Werner
Am 18.12.10 11:42, schrieb Gerhard:
hi @ all,
imo we should host some examples at apache-extras. it would be
easier
for contributors to donate their examples.
we have the choice between svn and mercurial. the advantage of
svn is
that most contributors are familiar with svn.
however, with mercurial it's easier for contributors to fork
the repository and to contribute their examples. moreover, it's
easier
to mirror the repository e.g. to bitbucket which offers more
features.
furthermore, it would be nice to have one repository per
subproject/topic.
e.g. myfaces-extval-examples, myfaces-codi-examples,
myfaces-stacks-examples, ..., myfaces-helpline (for easier
communication
on the users-list)
that would allow a clear separation concerning the wiki and the
issue
tracker.
-> +1 for mercurial and one repository per subproject/topic.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
