Hi Ganesh, I would prefer option 2, but just disabling it maybe isn't the whole story here. I don't know exactly, but what if Weld or something else uses the Flash scope internally?
To avoid running into deep troubles here it would be great to check if the Flash scope was disabled (via the new config parameter), but some code wants to use it and then throw an exception in this case. Regards, Jakob 2011/3/9 Ganesh <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > A customer of mine doesn't like MyFaces to send the > oam.Flash.RENDERMAP.TOKEN to his clients. There is > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3005 for this issue. I see 3 > possible solutions: > > 1 - adding a config param to disable JSF built-in scopes (they are using > weld) > 2 - adding a config param to disable flash > 3 - compiling a custom MyFaces 2.04a for the customer > > I would provide a solution for 1 or 2, if you agree, if you don't I'd > probably have to switch to 3. What do you think? > > Best regards, > Ganesh > > Am 21.12.2010 11:44, schrieb Jakob Korherr: >> >> Created MYFACES-3005. >> >> Regards, >> Jakob >> >> 2010/12/21 Jakob Korherr<[email protected]>: >>> >>> Hi Ganesh, >>> >>> Good point. Frankly I have not thought of not sending the cookie if >>> there is no data in the flash scope. Thanks for the hint! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jakob >>> >>> 2010/12/19 Ganesh<[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Though flash scope is not is use, MyFaces 2.0 sends this cookie. Is this >>>> a >>>> bug or a feature? If it's a feature: Have we provided a way to turn it >>>> off? >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Ganesh >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jakob Korherr >>> >>> blog: http://www.jakobk.com >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr >>> work: http://www.irian.at >>> >> >> >> > > -- > "There are two kinds of people in the world, those who believe there are two > kinds of people and those who don't." > — Robert Benchley > -- Jakob Korherr blog: http://www.jakobk.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr work: http://www.irian.at
