Hi Yes, that param sounds good.
regards, Leonardo 2011/3/10 Ganesh <[email protected]> > Hi, > > Yes, true. I'm setting up an implementation that checks a context param > org.apache.myfaces.DISABLE_FLASH_SCOPE (true/false) and throws a > FlashScopeDisabledException in case someone calls one of the public Map > acces methods like get, put, keep or putNow. > > Best regards, > Ganesh > > Am 10.03.2011 15:49, schrieb Jakob Korherr: > > Hi Ganesh, >> >> I would prefer option 2, but just disabling it maybe isn't the whole >> story here. I don't know exactly, but what if Weld or something else >> uses the Flash scope internally? >> >> To avoid running into deep troubles here it would be great to check if >> the Flash scope was disabled (via the new config parameter), but some >> code wants to use it and then throw an exception in this case. >> >> Regards, >> Jakob >> >> 2011/3/9 Ganesh<[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> A customer of mine doesn't like MyFaces to send the >>> oam.Flash.RENDERMAP.TOKEN to his clients. There is >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3005 for this issue. I see >>> 3 >>> possible solutions: >>> >>> 1 - adding a config param to disable JSF built-in scopes (they are using >>> weld) >>> 2 - adding a config param to disable flash >>> 3 - compiling a custom MyFaces 2.04a for the customer >>> >>> I would provide a solution for 1 or 2, if you agree, if you don't I'd >>> probably have to switch to 3. What do you think? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Ganesh >>> >>> Am 21.12.2010 11:44, schrieb Jakob Korherr: >>> >>>> >>>> Created MYFACES-3005. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jakob >>>> >>>> 2010/12/21 Jakob Korherr<[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Ganesh, >>>>> >>>>> Good point. Frankly I have not thought of not sending the cookie if >>>>> there is no data in the flash scope. Thanks for the hint! >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Jakob >>>>> >>>>> 2010/12/19 Ganesh<[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Though flash scope is not is use, MyFaces 2.0 sends this cookie. Is >>>>>> this >>>>>> a >>>>>> bug or a feature? If it's a feature: Have we provided a way to turn it >>>>>> off? >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Ganesh >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jakob Korherr >>>>> >>>>> blog: http://www.jakobk.com >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr >>>>> work: http://www.irian.at >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> "There are two kinds of people in the world, those who believe there are >>> two >>> kinds of people and those who don't." >>> — Robert Benchley >>> >>> >> >> >> > -- > "There are two kinds of people in the world, those who believe there are > two kinds of people and those who don't." > — Robert Benchley >
