Hi Thinking about this, shaded-impl in 2.1.x branch (current trunk) should have the same group id.
Leonardo Uribe 2011/7/7 Jan-Kees van Andel <[email protected]>: > +1 Good idea! > > /JK > > Op 7 jul. 2011 19:42 schreef "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> > het volgende: >> +1 >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> Your JSF powerhouse - >> JSF Consulting, Development and >> Courses in English and German >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> >> >> 2011/7/7 Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> >> >>> Hi >>> >>> +1, sounds good. Since it is an internal module that shouldn't and >>> can't be used in a independent way, change its group-id is not a >>> problem. >>> >>> Leonardo Uribe >>> >>> 2011/7/7 Jakob Korherr <[email protected]>: >>> > Hi guys, >>> > >>> > About a year ago we introduced the myfaces-impl-ee6 module, which >>> > includes the servlet 3.0 related stuff for myfaces-impl. This means >>> > the module is only needed for development reasons and will be shaded >>> > into myfaces-impl anyway. >>> > >>> > However, I noticed that some developers who are not that familiar with >>> > MyFaces core don't know what to do with myfaces-impl-ee6. Some even >>> > think this is the replacement of myfaces-impl when using java ee 6, >>> > which is - of course - complete nonsense. >>> > >>> > Thus I would like to propose to change the groupId of myfaces-impl-ee6 >>> > from org.apache.myfaces.core to org.apache.myfaces.core.internal. IMO >>> > this makes it a lot more clear that this module is for internal >>> > purposes only! >>> > >>> > Any objections, better ideas? >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Jakob >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Jakob Korherr >>> > >>> > blog: http://www.jakobk.com >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr >>> > work: http://www.irian.at >>> > >>> >
