Changes are committed, issue is resolved!

Regards,
Jakob

2011/7/8 Jakob Korherr <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> You're right, Leonardo. This module should be changed too.
>
> I created MYFACES-3210 for this task.
>
> Regards,
> Jakob
>
> 2011/7/7 Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]>:
>> Hi
>>
>> Thinking about this, shaded-impl in 2.1.x branch (current trunk)
>> should have the same group id.
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> 2011/7/7 Jan-Kees van Andel <[email protected]>:
>>> +1 Good idea!
>>>
>>> /JK
>>>
>>> Op 7 jul. 2011 19:42 schreef "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]>
>>> het volgende:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> gerhard
>>>>
>>>> http://www.irian.at
>>>>
>>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>>>> Courses in English and German
>>>>
>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2011/7/7 Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> +1, sounds good. Since it is an internal module that shouldn't and
>>>>> can't be used in a independent way, change its group-id is not a
>>>>> problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/7/7 Jakob Korherr <[email protected]>:
>>>>> > Hi guys,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > About a year ago we introduced the myfaces-impl-ee6 module, which
>>>>> > includes the servlet 3.0 related stuff for myfaces-impl. This means
>>>>> > the module is only needed for development reasons and will be shaded
>>>>> > into myfaces-impl anyway.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > However, I noticed that some developers who are not that familiar with
>>>>> > MyFaces core don't know what to do with myfaces-impl-ee6. Some even
>>>>> > think this is the replacement of myfaces-impl when using java ee 6,
>>>>> > which is - of course - complete nonsense.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thus I would like to propose to change the groupId of myfaces-impl-ee6
>>>>> > from org.apache.myfaces.core to org.apache.myfaces.core.internal. IMO
>>>>> > this makes it a lot more clear that this module is for internal
>>>>> > purposes only!
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Any objections, better ideas?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>> > Jakob
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Jakob Korherr
>>>>> >
>>>>> > blog: http://www.jakobk.com
>>>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
>>>>> > work: http://www.irian.at
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jakob Korherr
>
> blog: http://www.jakobk.com
> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
> work: http://www.irian.at
>



-- 
Jakob Korherr

blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at

Reply via email to