Hi Werner Does this strategy generates a .jar?
regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/7/25 Werner Punz <[email protected]>: > Ok I have basically all patterns working, please revisit the link, you can > see now the api, the runtime class (basically a namespace with a set of > functions) > and the _Lang.js class, a singleton delegate which delegates the namespace. > The normal classes now should be no problem as well since they use > the same doc mechanics as the singleton objects. > > Again here is the link > > http://people.apache.org/~werpu/jsdoc/symbols/jsf.html > > Which means, I will rework the scripts first to allow jsdoc to compile them > properly and then once done, I will integrate jsdoc properly into our build > system. > > > Werner > > > > > Am 25.07.11 16:36, schrieb Werner Punz: >> >> Actually I am working on the impl classes so far it looks like I can >> pull it off the _Runtime.js can definitely be documented via jsdoc. >> The other classes which are more OO probably also can be mapped into our >> jsdocs. >> >> >> >> Am 25.07.11 15:35, schrieb Jakob Korherr: >>> >>> Very nice. Great job, Werner! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jakob >>> >>> 2011/7/25 Werner Punz<[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Hi everyone, I have started this week to work on the javascript >>>> documentation issues, so far I can cover our API classes pretty well >>>> with >>>> jsdoc. Only one minor code modification was needed to get it up and >>>> running. >>>> >>>> Here is a first rough result by using jsdoc on the API section: >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~werpu/jsdoc/symbols/jsf.html >>>> >>>> Since my first goal simply was to get the api docs out I will merge this >>>> into our maven build and do the code adjustements as needed. >>>> To get jsdocs for the impl is a nice to have but not vital, since the >>>> impl >>>> classes should not be used anyway by the users. >>>> >>>> Werner >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
