Hi Leo no just the plain html docs.
I have to check if we can generate a jar out of it, if not we probably
have to jar the stuff ourselves.
Werner
Am 25.07.11 18:20, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
Hi Werner
Does this strategy generates a .jar?
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2011/7/25 Werner Punz<[email protected]>:
Ok I have basically all patterns working, please revisit the link, you can
see now the api, the runtime class (basically a namespace with a set of
functions)
and the _Lang.js class, a singleton delegate which delegates the namespace.
The normal classes now should be no problem as well since they use
the same doc mechanics as the singleton objects.
Again here is the link
http://people.apache.org/~werpu/jsdoc/symbols/jsf.html
Which means, I will rework the scripts first to allow jsdoc to compile them
properly and then once done, I will integrate jsdoc properly into our build
system.
Werner
Am 25.07.11 16:36, schrieb Werner Punz:
Actually I am working on the impl classes so far it looks like I can
pull it off the _Runtime.js can definitely be documented via jsdoc.
The other classes which are more OO probably also can be mapped into our
jsdocs.
Am 25.07.11 15:35, schrieb Jakob Korherr:
Very nice. Great job, Werner!
Regards,
Jakob
2011/7/25 Werner Punz<[email protected]>:
Hi everyone, I have started this week to work on the javascript
documentation issues, so far I can cover our API classes pretty well
with
jsdoc. Only one minor code modification was needed to get it up and
running.
Here is a first rough result by using jsdoc on the API section:
http://people.apache.org/~werpu/jsdoc/symbols/jsf.html
Since my first goal simply was to get the api docs out I will merge this
into our maven build and do the code adjustements as needed.
To get jsdocs for the impl is a nice to have but not vital, since the
impl
classes should not be used anyway by the users.
Werner
