hi scott, yes - that isn't a big issue (even though the reason for it is quite questionable, if you consider the changes in jsf 2.1). however, i'm more concerned about the implication of the topics i mentioned earlier.
regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2013/10/30 Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]> > Hey guys, I understand some of the frustration, but MyFaces 2.1 and > Trinidad 2.0 is an invalid configuration. Why would a release of Trinidad > 2.1 (which is designed for JSF 2.1) not solve this issue. > -- > Scott O'Bryan > Sent with Airmail <http://airmailapp.com/tracking> > > On October 30, 2013 at 1:28:20 AM, Gerhard Petracek ( > [email protected] <//[email protected]>) wrote: > > hi eduardo, > > if so: please file the corresponding jira-ticket/s. > > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - > JavaEE Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > 2013/10/30 Contrib <[email protected]> > >> There are some bugfixes on MyFaces 2.1, and projects having Trinidad >> 2.0 as part of the stack, cannot update it due this. >> >> Regards, >> >> Eduardo >> >> El 28/10/13 10:09, Gerhard Petracek escribió: >> >> it isn't only about one release. >> e.g. 2.1.0 was just skipped and at least a part is broken since months >> (see [1] and [2]). >> therefore i called this thread "trinidad.next" instead of "trinidad >> 2.1.1". >> >> imo: >> the current situation isn't acceptable for users. >> committers who work on trinidad on a regular basis should also do >> releases on a regular basis. >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2422 >> [2] >> https://builds.apache.org/job/Trinidad%20Core%20Trunk%20(snapshot)/<https://builds.apache.org/job/Trinidad%20Core%20Trunk%20%28snapshot%29/> >> >> >> >> 2013/10/18 Hazem Saleh <[email protected]> >> >>> +1 for a release too. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Werner Punz <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Am 17.10.13 22:47, schrieb Gerhard Petracek: >>>> >>>> hi @ all, >>>>> >>>>> we haven't seen a trinidad release for almost >20 months<. >>>>> it's known that other projects are based on trinidad and therefore it's >>>>> obvious that they have to use snapshot versions. >>>>> >>>>> imo: >>>>> since there are commits on a regular basis, there should be also >>>>> releases on a regular basis. >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> gerhard >>>>> >>>> +1 for a release >>>> >>>> >>>> Werner >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Hazem Saleh >>> >>> Author of JavaScript Unit Testing book: >>> http://www.amazon.com/dp/1782160620/ >>> >>> Co-author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets) book: >>> http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B002M052KY >>> >>> DeveloperWorks Contributing Author >>> >>> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/hazem/entry/ibm_developerworks_contributing_author?lang=en_us >>> >>> An Apache committer, IBMer, and a technical speaker >>> >>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/hazems >>> >> >> >> >
