That's only if you are wrapping another ExternalContext.  If you need to create 
an ExternalContext out of thin air, then any new abstract methods are a 
problem.  Essentially, the JSF specification made an incompatible api change 
between JSF 2.0 and 2.1.

-- Blake Sullivan

On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:

> @ExternalContext:
> there shouldn't be an issue due to ExternalContextWrapper.
> 
> in any case +1 for the rest.
> 
> regards,
> gerhard
> 
> http://www.irian.at
> 
> Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse -
> JavaEE Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
> 
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> 
> 
> 
> 2013/10/30 Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]>
> Gerhard and Devs,
> 
> The problem is there was some 2.1 stuff added to the ExternalContext I 
> believe.  At any rate, I agree with you and I've managed to free up some free 
> time to get a release.  So here is what I suggest:
> 
> 1) I'm going to begin the release of the Trinidad plugins.  With voting this 
> should give us a couple of days to get the main trinidad 2.1 release where we 
> want it.
> 
> 2) I'm hearing concerns about some of the functionality, so while the 
> Trinidad Plugin release is underway, let's try and figure out which 
> uncomiited community patches are out there and should make this release.  
> Getting help from you guys on which bugs are important would be a huge help 
> because there is a lot in our bug queue and it would take me a long time to 
> sort everything out.
> 
> 3) I've already fixed Gerhard's issue he raised below.  You're 100% right, 
> this shouldn't have happened.  There is a slight build with the Jenkins 
> sanity and I'm taking a look at that now, but the snapshots are building fine.
> 
> 4) Let's get through this release and then we'll talk about future steps once 
> the release is complete.
> 
> Sounds like a plan?
> -- 
> Scott O'Bryan
> 
> On October 30, 2013 at 7:59:38 AM, Gerhard Petracek 
> ([email protected]) wrote:
> 
>> you
> 

Reply via email to