+1

Eduardo M. Breijo

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:10 AM, Udo Schnurpfeil <lof...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> Regards,
>
> Udo
>
> Am 27.02.18 um 16:22 schrieb Paul Nicolucci:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul Nicolucci
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Thomas Andraschko ---02/26/2018 06:04:03
> PM---Ok, but as ManagedBeans are deprecated, it also fails w]Thomas
> Andraschko ---02/26/2018 06:04:03 PM---Ok, but as ManagedBeans are
> deprecated, it also fails with older MF versions and it's probably relat
>
> From: Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org> <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
> Date: 02/26/2018 06:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release of MyFaces Core 2.3.0
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Ok, but as ManagedBeans are deprecated, it also fails with older MF
> versions and it's probably related to Jetty -> it's no blocker. I will
> create a separate topic for this issue.
>
> +1 - build is fine, rat is fine, all my other tests are fine.
>
> 2018-02-26 23:46 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> *andraschko.tho...@gmail.com* <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>>:
>
>    Ok, seems like @PostConstruct of a @ManagedBean isn't called anymore.
>
>    Seems like the ManagedBean is instantiated correctly, the
>    @ManagedProperty's are resolved but @PostConstruct isn't called.
>    ManagedBeanBuilder ln213 calls the LifecycleProvider2 to do the
>    @PostConstruct but nothing happens.
>
>    Any idea why a Tomcat7LifecycleProvider is used when running with
>    mvn-jetty? As InstanceManager
>    
> *http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.apache.tomcat/tomcat-api/8.0.12/org/apache/tomcat/SimpleInstanceManager.java*
>    
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__grepcode.com_file_repo1.maven.org_maven2_org.apache.tomcat_tomcat-2Dapi_8.0.12_org_apache_tomcat_SimpleInstanceManager.java&d=DwMFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=n-2RUhyQkncKQNTGKy9UmSKIHKSZzEVYEqiy1H7hEwA&m=GQI8rpQoDrdQHm_Galm9hft6-jzEr-7wUHBq_Y-ah_Y&s=shyuQdV3Hn5DYnmLRI4rxbWNyiVZYEhKlmYPTVPz3Ag&e=>
>    is used, which really does nothing.
>    Should this work? I wonder how did this ever work?
>    Tried it again and faced the same problem with MF2.2 now....
>
>
>    2018-02-26 23:09 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>    *andraschko.tho...@gmail.com* <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>>:
>    Currently testing the PrimeFaces showcase and it seems something is
>    broken regarding UIData :/
>    Will come back after checking the details tomorrow. Our lazy datatable
>    works fine with MF2.2 and Mojarra2.3 but not MF2.3.
>
>    2018-02-26 18:58 GMT+01:00 Eduardo B <*ebre...@gmail.com*
>    <ebre...@gmail.com>>:
>       Hello,
>
>       I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.3.0 release of Apache
>       MyFaces core out.
>
>       Please note that this vote concerns the following part:
>           1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v2.3.0  [1]
>
>       The artifacts were deployed on nexus repo [1] for binary and source
>       packages.
>
>       The release notes could be found at [4].
>
>       Also the japicmp tool (similar to clirr tool) does not show binary
>       incompatibilities with myfaces-api.
>
>       Please take a look at the "2.3.0" artifacts and vote! (see [3])
>
>       Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of
>       three +1 votes (see [2]).
>
>       ------------------------------------------------
>       [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>       [ ] +0
>       [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>       released, and why..............
>       ------------------------------------------------
>
>       Thanks,
>       Eduardo M. Breijo
>
>       [1]
>       
> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-1130/org/apache/myfaces/core/*
>       
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__repository.apache.org_content_repositories_orgapachemyfaces-2D1130_org_apache_myfaces_core_&d=DwMFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=n-2RUhyQkncKQNTGKy9UmSKIHKSZzEVYEqiy1H7hEwA&m=GQI8rpQoDrdQHm_Galm9hft6-jzEr-7wUHBq_Y-ah_Y&s=yQMoL-3J_esgYqgTyzIOLZx1EwEnF3rk_ovf525IzEY&e=>
>       [2] *http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes*
>       
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.apache.org_foundation_voting.html-23ReleaseVotes&d=DwMFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=n-2RUhyQkncKQNTGKy9UmSKIHKSZzEVYEqiy1H7hEwA&m=GQI8rpQoDrdQHm_Galm9hft6-jzEr-7wUHBq_Y-ah_Y&s=T2DaUKjkArw2Jv9oUHG-Hza1g6604g3h3x-yzQj_6IE&e=>
>       [3]
>       
> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-1130/org/apache/myfaces/core/myfaces-core-assembly/*
>       
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__repository.apache.org_content_repositories_orgapachemyfaces-2D1130_org_apache_myfaces_core_myfaces-2Dcore-2Dassembly_&d=DwMFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=n-2RUhyQkncKQNTGKy9UmSKIHKSZzEVYEqiy1H7hEwA&m=GQI8rpQoDrdQHm_Galm9hft6-jzEr-7wUHBq_Y-ah_Y&s=W231pmWnq5GfFjjPeJtWcCcIZZnQqUiIJ7yEKOG8Gfc&e=>
>       [4]
>       
> *https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&version=12339569*
>       
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_secure_ReleaseNote.jspa-3FprojectId-3D10600-26version-3D12339569&d=DwMFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=n-2RUhyQkncKQNTGKy9UmSKIHKSZzEVYEqiy1H7hEwA&m=GQI8rpQoDrdQHm_Galm9hft6-jzEr-7wUHBq_Y-ah_Y&s=dF0Dw8SuO_-seG34zhe7n6OVl8syBCI32q8l14f9rso&e=>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to