Are we sure it is 2.9 and not 2.4?  We might want to check that just to be
sure I'm not saying it is incorrect I just didn't see it going to 2.9.

Thanks,

Paul Nicolucci

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:35 AM Thomas Andraschko <
[email protected]> wrote:

> AFAIK Jakarta 9 will contain JSF 2.3 with Jakarta namespace + version
> bumped to 2.9.
> I dont think that this is huge effort. Just fork 2.3 and rename everything.
>
> Current 3.0 Targets Jakarta10 / JSF 3 with removed Faces EL, Managed Beans
> and heavy cleanup.
>
> I would do this:
> - release 3.0 M1 with javax, the current code ist stable, faster, smaller
> and OK to use
> - fork 2.3 as 2.9 and change to Jakarta package and do 2.9M1
> - Change Jakarta namespace on 3.0 and do a 3.0M2
>
>
> Paul Nicolucci <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., 15. Nov. 2019,
> 17:18:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think we also need to start thinking about the package name changes
>> from javax.faces to jakarta.faces for the API. This would be a change that
>> would certainly be in JSF 3.0 whenever that specification comes out
>> (Jakarta EE 10?). In addition I think the Jakarta community is looking to
>> release Jakarta EE 9 which would just be Java EE 8 with the API package
>> name change javax->jakarta so we need to start looking at a Jakarta 9
>> branch perhaps in the MyFaces code base. I would think that the Jakarta EE
>> 9 changes would more than likely jump the JSF spec version to 2.4.
>>
>> In my opinion we should hold off on a release, review the Jakarta
>> information and make any necessary changes to the MyFaces code base as the
>> Jakarta projects move forward.
>>
>> For the current Jakarta EE 9 Status see:
>> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/blob/gh-pages/minutes/2019-11-12.md
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Paul Nicolucci
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 2:36 PM Thomas Andraschko <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> JFYI:
>>> i think i'm finally "done" with the refactorings.
>>> I will start with a release vote the next days.
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>>  Virenfrei.
>>> www.avast.com
>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>> <#m_853411485417842697_m_8209636381781010786_m_-2701175102028896175_m_1314111415991572004_m_119743608639799328_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>
>>> Am Sa., 20. Apr. 2019 um 09:27 Uhr schrieb Werner Punz <
>>> [email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> +1 from my side. I will add a bunch of additional client tests after
>>>> easter.
>>>>
>>>> Am Fr., 19. Apr. 2019 um 21:44 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT about release a M1?
>>>>>
>>>>> The current master received a BIG cleanup compared to 2.3 and we
>>>>> already removed @ManagedBeans and Faces EL.
>>>>> I also introduced integrationtests and Werner provided many tests for
>>>>> the client side.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think its a good time to release a M1 and maybe get some feedback.
>>>>> Maybe also a good promotion that we currently more active as competitors 
>>>>> ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>>>>  Virenfrei.
>>>>> www.avast.com
>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>>>> <#m_853411485417842697_m_8209636381781010786_m_-2701175102028896175_m_1314111415991572004_m_119743608639799328_m_129114922430811379_m_-3822526704907192759_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to