Or leave the same artifact and Version and do a: 2.3.6-modern The we dont have to add new Versions in jira. Makes everything bit easier
Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> schrieb am So., 8. Dez. 2019, 13:03: > I also thought about another way of releasing it. > Whats the big difference between 2.3 and 3.0 currently: > - removed ManagedBeans > - removed FacesEL > - big cleanup > > If we would simply readd the ManagedBean API, we could register the found > beans as CDI beans. Thats what DeltaSpike makes. > We could also add back the FacesEL API but not the impl. Its not used > anymore by any component lib. > > So we would have a JSF 2.3 compatible release which delegates the > ManagedBeans to CDI. That will make it usable by all CDI users. > > Wdyt? > We could call it: > org.apache.myfaces.core:myfaces-api-modern:2.3.0 > > > > > > > Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> schrieb am Di., 19. Nov. > 2019, 22:21: > >> no problem, lets wait. >> we could also release it as something like 2.3-minmal or something. >> >> Am Di., 19. Nov. 2019 um 22:05 Uhr schrieb Paul Nicolucci < >> [email protected]>: >> >>> This actually came up on the platform dev call this morning. A thread >>> was started here for discussion: >>> https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-platform-dev/msg00907.html I >>> think we should follow that conversation and wait for a release until those >>> details are hammered out. >>> >>> I just don't want us to release a JSF 3.0 with new functionality in it >>> when it might be true that 3.0 would be the version for just the Jakarta >>> namespace update and the release Thomas is working on would be something >>> other than 3.0. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Paul Nicolucci >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:17 PM Paul Nicolucci <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the information Thomas. I just sent a note to the mailing >>>> list to get clarification for us: >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/lists/faces-dev/msg00006.html >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Paul Nicolucci >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 12:40 PM Thomas Andraschko < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Arjan has it as 2.9 in its presentation. Not sure. >>>>> >>>>> Paul Nicolucci <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., 15. Nov. 2019, >>>>> 18:26: >>>>> >>>>>> Are we sure it is 2.9 and not 2.4? We might want to check that just >>>>>> to be sure I'm not saying it is incorrect I just didn't see it going to >>>>>> 2.9. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Paul Nicolucci >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:35 AM Thomas Andraschko < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> AFAIK Jakarta 9 will contain JSF 2.3 with Jakarta namespace + >>>>>>> version bumped to 2.9. >>>>>>> I dont think that this is huge effort. Just fork 2.3 and rename >>>>>>> everything. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Current 3.0 Targets Jakarta10 / JSF 3 with removed Faces EL, Managed >>>>>>> Beans and heavy cleanup. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would do this: >>>>>>> - release 3.0 M1 with javax, the current code ist stable, faster, >>>>>>> smaller and OK to use >>>>>>> - fork 2.3 as 2.9 and change to Jakarta package and do 2.9M1 >>>>>>> - Change Jakarta namespace on 3.0 and do a 3.0M2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul Nicolucci <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., 15. Nov. >>>>>>> 2019, 17:18: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think we also need to start thinking about the package name >>>>>>>> changes from javax.faces to jakarta.faces for the API. This would be a >>>>>>>> change that would certainly be in JSF 3.0 whenever that specification >>>>>>>> comes >>>>>>>> out (Jakarta EE 10?). In addition I think the Jakarta community is >>>>>>>> looking >>>>>>>> to release Jakarta EE 9 which would just be Java EE 8 with the API >>>>>>>> package >>>>>>>> name change javax->jakarta so we need to start looking at a Jakarta 9 >>>>>>>> branch perhaps in the MyFaces code base. I would think that the >>>>>>>> Jakarta EE >>>>>>>> 9 changes would more than likely jump the JSF spec version to 2.4. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In my opinion we should hold off on a release, review the Jakarta >>>>>>>> information and make any necessary changes to the MyFaces code base as >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> Jakarta projects move forward. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For the current Jakarta EE 9 Status see: >>>>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/blob/gh-pages/minutes/2019-11-12.md >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Paul Nicolucci >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 2:36 PM Thomas Andraschko < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> JFYI: >>>>>>>>> i think i'm finally "done" with the refactorings. >>>>>>>>> I will start with a release vote the next days. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> >>>>>>>>> Virenfrei. >>>>>>>>> www.avast.com >>>>>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> >>>>>>>>> <#m_4776714238409668344_m_-2613558047958076262_m_7419120885498924195_m_-5143760612097938423_m_4414407687902447532_m_-3948930198793418650_m_853411485417842697_m_8209636381781010786_m_-2701175102028896175_m_1314111415991572004_m_119743608639799328_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am Sa., 20. Apr. 2019 um 09:27 Uhr schrieb Werner Punz < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 from my side. I will add a bunch of additional client tests >>>>>>>>>> after easter. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am Fr., 19. Apr. 2019 um 21:44 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> WDYT about release a M1? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The current master received a BIG cleanup compared to 2.3 and we >>>>>>>>>>> already removed @ManagedBeans and Faces EL. >>>>>>>>>>> I also introduced integrationtests and Werner provided many >>>>>>>>>>> tests for the client side. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think its a good time to release a M1 and maybe get some >>>>>>>>>>> feedback. Maybe also a good promotion that we currently more active >>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>> competitors ;) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Thomas >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> >>>>>>>>>>> Virenfrei. >>>>>>>>>>> www.avast.com >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> >>>>>>>>>>> <#m_4776714238409668344_m_-2613558047958076262_m_7419120885498924195_m_-5143760612097938423_m_4414407687902447532_m_-3948930198793418650_m_853411485417842697_m_8209636381781010786_m_-2701175102028896175_m_1314111415991572004_m_119743608639799328_m_129114922430811379_m_-3822526704907192759_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
