+1 from me.

Thanks,

Paul Nicolucci

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 3:30 PM Melloware Inc <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Perfect!
>
> Melloware
> @melloware on GitHub
>
> > On May 23, 2023, at 3:12 PM, Volodymyr Siedlecki <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Turns out these failures were infrastructure related.  Manual tests show
> that they pass.
> >
> > I'll change vote to a +1.
> >
> > If no objections, I'll release 4.0.1 tomorrow?
> >
> > Best,
> > Volodymyr
> >
> >> On 2023/05/22 13:39:11 Volodymyr Siedlecki via dev wrote:
> >> Hey Thomas,
> >>
> >> Yes, the TCK tests were passing previously on 4.0.0.   I haven’t
> investigated into the root causes yet, but I’ll look soon.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Volodymyr
> >>
> >> From: Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Monday, May 22, 2023 at 4:05 AM
> >> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release of MyFaces Core 4.0.1
> >> and they are working on 4. 0. 0? Am So. , 21. Mai 2023 um 03: 23 Uhr
> schrieb Volodymyr Siedlecki <volosied@ apache. org>: Sorry, I linked the
> classes, not the tests. Here are the 7 failing tests (from the old tck):
> com. sun. ts. tests. jsf. spec. appconfigresources. absolute_ordering.
> URLClient
> >> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> >> This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
> >> You have not previously corresponded with this sender.
> >> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> >> and they are working on 4.0.0?
> >>
> >> Am So., 21. Mai 2023 um 03:23 Uhr schrieb Volodymyr Siedlecki <
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:
> >> Sorry, I linked the classes, not the tests. Here are the 7 failing
> tests (from the old tck):
> >>
> >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.appconfigresources.absolute_ordering.URLClient
> >> - testDocumentAbsoluteOrdering
> >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.appconfigresources.relative_ordering.URLClient
> >> - testDocumentRelativeOrderingTest1
> >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.appconfigresources.startupbehavior.URLClient
> >> - applicationConfigurationfilesTest1
> >> - applicationConfigurationfilesTest2
> >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.composite.insertchildren.URLClient
> >> - compositeRenderUsingPageChildrenTagTest
> >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.coretags.selectitems.URLClient
> >> - selectItemsValueTest
> >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.coretags.viewaction.URLClient
> >> - viewActionTest
> >>
> >>> On 2023/05/21 01:18:57 Volodymyr Siedlecki wrote:
> >>> -1 for me.  TCK results finally got back (sorry for the delay) and we
> have failures for the following tests:
> >>>
> >>>
> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.appconfigresources.absolute_ordering.URLClient
> >>>
> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.appconfigresources.relative_ordering.URLClient
> >>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.appconfigresources.startupbehavior.URLClient
> >>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.composite.insertchildren.URLClient
> >>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.coretags.selectitems.URLClient
> >>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.coretags.viewaction.URLClient
> >>>
> >>> I will need to investigate them.
> >>>
> >>> On 2023/05/18 00:41:36 Thomas Andraschko wrote:
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> Melloware <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> schrieb am Mi., 17. Mai 2023, 22:11:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 5/17/2023 3:52 PM, Volodymyr Siedlecki wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I was running the needed tasks to get the 4.0.1 release of Apache
> >>>>>> MyFaces core out.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
> >>>>>>   1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v4.0.1  [1]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The artifacts were deployed on nexus repo [1] for binary and source
> >>>>>> packages.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The release notes could be found at [4].
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The japicmp tool shows no binary incompatibilities with 4.0.1 when
> >>>>>> compared to the previous 4.0.0 jar. Please take a look at the
> attached
> >>>>>> results.html.
> >>>>>> If requested, I can provide a comparison to the Jakarta Faces 4.0.1
> API.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This release has not yet been run against the TCK, but I am working
> to
> >>>>>> create a build which will run against the TCK. I hope to have
> results
> >>>>>> by May 19.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please take a look at the "4.0.1" artifacts and vote! (see [3])
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of
> three
> >>>>>> +1 votes (see [2]).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> >>>>>> [ ] +0
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> >>>>>> released, and why.
> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Volodymyr
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-1231/org/apache/myfaces/core/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-1231/org/apache/myfaces/core/
> >
> >>>>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes<
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes>
> >>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-1231/org/apache/myfaces/core/myfaces-core-assembly/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-1231/org/apache/myfaces/core/myfaces-core-assembly/
> >
> >>>>>> [4]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&version=12352978
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&version=12352978
> >
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&version=12352978
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&version=12352978
> >>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Melloware
> >>>>> melloware@
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>

Reply via email to