Hi, > 1. Do a first Apache release capable of producing a downloadable RTOS image > with support for multiple peripherals and network connectivity. Do subsequent > releases to indicate thorough understanding, repeatability, and maturity of > process.
As we already have made releases perhaps change to “Make further releases” ? > 2. Continue to develop and execute policies that enable project contributors > to achieve self-governance > 3. Expand community - attract new project contributors and users, grow > committer base > 1. Mailing list activity since last report in January: > @dev 500+ messages exchanged, 26 new subscribers (46 total) > @commits 400+ messages, 3 new committers (19 total) IMO just replace with “Healthy active mailing list with increasing subscribers”? > 2. Repo is being cloned and looked at by external parties including 5+ > device/chip vendors, student community, and researchers. Perhaps reword? Continual outside interest by 3rd parties? What are we doing to attract them to be involved here? > 3. Active participation on the @dev mailing list covered a range of topics > including feature implementation approaches (e.g. Hardware Abstraction Layer, > Newt build tool options, logs and stats amongst several others), code size > concerns and mitigations of those concerns, coding practices, documentation > fixes and enhancements. Feedback from beta testers received and discussed. Probably cut the above as may not be much interest to the board. > How has the project developed since the last report? > > 1. Releases: Two releases so far - first on 22nd Feb, next on 18th March > - Identified and fixed license issues, regular process established to > check for license issues esp. with third party software > - Tagging process and release candidate naming process tested and used > - Voting process and timelines established and used > Also probably not of interest to the board is: > 2. Feature support: several new OS, BLE features and new board support added > When were the last committers or PMC members elected? > > At the start. We have added committers right? "3 new committers” are mentioned above. (That why I like a VOTE for committers it easy to find in the archives and clear who and when was invited,) Thanks, Justin
