+1

Thx!

> On Apr 6, 2016, at 1:33 AM, aditi hilbert <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Justin,
> 
> Thanks for the review. Here is the revised draft. I am trying to upload it to 
> the Apache site now.
> 
> I misspoke actually. Three new people started adding code via pull 
> requests/patches. We decided on the process to add committers but never 
> formally put the two largest contributors (committer candidates) to vote.  
> I’ll send out the formal request for vote.
> 
> thanks,
> aditi
> 
> ———
> 
> Mynewt 
> Mynewt is a real-time operating system for constrained embedded systems like 
> wearables, lightbulbs, locks and doorbells. It works on a variety of 32-bit 
> MCUs (microcontrollers), including ARM Cortex-M and MIPS architectures. 
> Mynewt has been incubating since 2015-10-20. 
> 
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: 
> 1. Make further releases capable of producing a downloadable RTOS image with 
> support for multiple peripherals and network connectivity. Do subsequent 
> releases to indicate thorough understanding, repeatability, and maturity of 
> process. 
> 2. Continue to develop and execute policies that enable project contributors 
> to achieve self-governance 
> 3. Expand community - attract new project contributors and users, grow 
> committer base 
> 
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware 
> of? 
> None 
> 
> How has the community developed since the last report? 
> 1. Healthy, active mailing lists with increasing numbers of subscribers
> 2. Continual outside interest by 3rd parties. Outreach via conferences, 
> exhibits, one on one meetings, beta testers, GSoC participation.
> 3. Vigorous discussions and implementation decisions via proposals and voting 
> on @dev mailing list.
> 
> How has the project developed since the last report? 
> 1. Releases:  Two releases so far - first on 22nd Feb, next on 18th March
>       - Identified and fixed license issues, regular process established to 
> check for license issues esp. with third party software
>       - Tagging process and release candidate naming process tested and used
>       - Voting process and timelines established and used
> 2. Documentation support: Several committers added documentation either 
> through direct git pushes or pull requests on github mirror.
> 3. Effort towards self governance: 
>       - Two releases completed successfully. 
>       - Two committer candidates going through voting for committer status 
> after meeting threshold of patch submissions.
> 
> Date of last release: 
> 18 March, 2016 
> 
> When were the last committers or PMC members elected? 
> At the start.
> 
> Signed-off-by: 
> [ ](mynewt) Sterling Hughes 
> [ ](mynewt) Jim Jagielski 
> [ ](mynewt) Justin Mclean 
> [ ](mynewt) Greg Stein 
> [ ](mynewt) P. Taylor Goetz 
> 
> Shepherd/Mentor notes:

Reply via email to