On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:06:37AM -0700, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> I think we do need a naming convention here - I'm fine adopting H_*.
> I'll point out that almost every POSIX or LIBC header I've ever seen
> uses underscore, and I believe this is only reserved in C++ -- that
> said, we need to be friendly to C++, and as you point out, we should
> follow a defined behavior.
These identifiers are reserved in C as well. From 7.1.3 of n1570:
All identifiers that begin with an underscore and either an
uppercase letter or another underscore are always reserved for for
any use.
(http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1570.pdf)
Chris
