On 4/26/16 9:22 AM, Christopher Collins wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:06:37AM -0700, Sterling Hughes wrote:
I think we do need a naming convention here - I'm fine adopting H_*.
I'll point out that almost every POSIX or LIBC header I've ever seen
uses underscore, and I believe this is only reserved in C++ -- that
said, we need to be friendly to C++, and as you point out, we should
follow a defined behavior.
These identifiers are reserved in C as well. From 7.1.3 of n1570:
All identifiers that begin with an underscore and either an
uppercase letter or another underscore are always reserved for for
any use.
(http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1570.pdf)
Hrm, you're right. There are a lot of POSIX headers that have undefined
behavior. :-)
Sterling
