Newt target show. In your case it's my_blinky_sim. I can tell because it's in the path to the elf file-- every target's build is put in a separate directory.
Sterling > On May 28, 2016, at 6:05 PM, David Moshal <[email protected]> wrote: > > how do I find the name of the target? > Dave > > >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Sterling Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: >> $ newt run my_blinky_sim >> >> Just the name of the target, don’t provide the binary path. All of the >> commands run based on the name of the target. >> >> We’ll update the documentation here: >> http://mynewt.apache.org/os/get_started/project_create/ >> >> to use newt run. It was written prior to the Docker image being supported, >> and works with the native toolset. >> >> Newt run is documented here: >> http://mynewt.apache.org/newt/command_list/newt_run/, albeit it should >> probably have better documentation for simulated targets. >> >> Sterling >> >>> On 28 May 2016, at 16:18, David Moshal wrote: >>> >>> ``` >>> ⇒ ../newt run ./bin/my_blinky_sim/apps/blinky/blinky 0 >>> Error: Invalid target name: ./bin/my_blinky_sim/apps/blinky/blinky >>> ``` >>> >>> Undocumented cryptic commands required for 'getting started' project ? >>> Not good, and doesn't inspire newbies to donate their time to the >>> project, just saying. >>> >>> For reference: it took me 5 mins from zero to blinky light on the mBed >>> platform, which seems like a reasonable alternative to MyNewt, best as >>> I can tell, so there's room for improvement if you want to grow the >>> platform. >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Christopher Collins >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 01:38:48PM -0700, Sterling Hughes wrote: >>>>> >>>>> $ newt run <target-name> >>>>> >>>>> Will do this for you. No need to call binary directly. >>>> >>>> >>>> If you are building for real hardware (i.e., not sim), then you need to >>>> add a version number to the end of the command. So, the command would >>>> look something like this: >>>> >>>> newt run myblinky 0 >>>> >>>> If you leave off the 0, you will get a cryptic and intimidating error >>>> message. >>>> >>>> I was thinking we might want to make the version number optional. When >>>> people use the run command, most of the time they probably don't care >>>> what version number the produced image has. >>>> >>>> Chris
