Hi,
On 7 Nov 2016, at 19:04, Christopher Collins wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:45:48AM -0800, marko kiiskila wrote:
On Nov 7, 2016, at 8:43 AM, Christopher Collins
<[email protected]> wrote:
Is there a particular reason that you would prefer this? By my
reading
of the standard, using angled-brackets for this purpose contradicts
their specified purpose, at least in spirit.
Familiarity of practice, I guess.
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/kernel/sched/core.c
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/kernel/sched/core.c>
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=style&sektion=9
<https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=style&sektion=9>
However, I’m not too tied to this, if you have a very strong
preference.
I don't think the Linux or FreeBSD kernels are a good example of
portable code! Honestly, I don't think there is any practical benefit
in doing it my way. My only interest in this issue is that I wince
whenever I see user headers being included with angle-brackets. If
there is any practical reason to do something different, then we
should
do it - that's why I asked if there was a particular reason for the
preference.
I think someone will update the coding standards file with some rule,
and everyone will be happy :).
I’m fine with either. I’ve also always adhered to what Marko
described (separate popular OS project had this as CODING STANDARD), but
I’m fine changing my habits.
+1 for keeping it consistent: either way.
Sterling
