Ian Lynch wrote:

> Maybe he's thinking inclusion rather than exclusion?

Yes, I'm being inclusive. The NLC is the most inclusive place at OOo. The 
NLC is not limited to any given topic. A talk could be about development, 
it could be about marketing, it could be about a cool new software for 
writing documentation (e.g. plone), whatever.

Anything that someone feels would be of value and interest to a 
significant portion of the global OOo community.

The NLC is the place that is most logical, the one that would benefit 
most, and has fewest constraints. So it is a sensible place to run this 
idea, which, I repeat, does not exclude anyone.


> Anything that was applicable to all NLC would by definition be 
> applicable to OOo as a whole. If you exclude things of general interest 
> you really say the whole idea is useless and it seems that you then 
> exclude English native speakers from NLC because they don't have a NL 
> project and therefore they only have an interest in OOo.

That's how I see it.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniel Carrera          | I don't want it perfect,
Join OOoAuthors today!  | I want it Tuesday.
http://oooauthors.org   | 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to