Better support for gdb, for example support for gdbserver (gdb target
remote), now is not possible to use this by ide.

czw., 1.08.2019, 22:47 użytkownik Brad Walker <bwal...@musings.com> napisał:

> I really would like to see a good embedded module for the platform. It
> doesn't seem like we have a good answer for this. Since I do embedded work
> in my professional life, I end up having to use Eclipse because that is
> what so many chip vendors provide with their SDK.
>
> So having said that, guess that means I'm volunteering to work on this,
> no?  8-)
>
> -brad w.
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:42 PM Geertjan Wielenga <geert...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > What new features would you like? What can you provide, what would you
> like
> > to focus on?
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 22:41, Brad Walker <bwal...@musings.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, that's what has always been said to me.. I should have worded my
> > > question more correctly.
> > >
> > > Once, that happens, then what would be the "vision" about the next
> > steps..
> > > Do we just start using it and jump in as needed? Is there a list of new
> > > features the group would like to see?
> > >
> > > Hopefully, I'm a little bit clearer.
> > >
> > > -brad w.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:24 PM Geertjan Wielenga <geert...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > The news has been consistent from the beginning — the code that
> > > constitutes
> > > > the C++ modules is part of the 4th donation, which is currently being
> > > > audited prior to donation by Oracle to Apache.
> > > >
> > > > Gj
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 20:58, Brad Walker <bwal...@musings.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Part of the reason I got involved with the NetBeans project was
> > > because I
> > > > > was interested in the C/C++ module.
> > > > >
> > > > > So what's the current status of this module? Is there anything I
> can
> > do
> > > > > there to help make it better or ready for consumption?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > -brad w.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to