+1 Eric for this proposition. On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 13:37 Eric Barboni <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi folks, > > I wonder if we can change the release process in the following way: > > For each Vote candidate: > Synchronization of all bits (of course sources are mandatory) maven > artefacts, installers (certified) > -- > A vote with everything inside with asking after normal check > (licence+checksum) for example which installer on which os. > > If source is wrong because of license, vote will be cancelled so we have to > regenerate everything. Was done for 11.3 not a big deal just time until we > got a fix. > > If everything in source is ok, then will go for normal tally with one PMC > vote per installer minimum. If I analyze on 11.3 it's only +1 or +0. So if > 11.3 vc1 license has been ok we would have save 72h. > > We lost a certification per non valid voting candidate (not sure how much > it > cost) > > If tally conduct to a release with an installer weird, if tally cover, just > release. And fix only the wrong installer. > > Best Regards > Eric > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
