Agree too. Gj
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 17:38, Patrick Musembi <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 Eric for this proposition. > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 13:37 Eric Barboni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > I wonder if we can change the release process in the following way: > > > > For each Vote candidate: > > Synchronization of all bits (of course sources are mandatory) maven > > artefacts, installers (certified) > > -- > > A vote with everything inside with asking after normal check > > (licence+checksum) for example which installer on which os. > > > > If source is wrong because of license, vote will be cancelled so we have > to > > regenerate everything. Was done for 11.3 not a big deal just time until > we > > got a fix. > > > > If everything in source is ok, then will go for normal tally with one PMC > > vote per installer minimum. If I analyze on 11.3 it's only +1 or +0. So > if > > 11.3 vc1 license has been ok we would have save 72h. > > > > We lost a certification per non valid voting candidate (not sure how much > > it > > cost) > > > > If tally conduct to a release with an installer weird, if tally cover, > just > > release. And fix only the wrong installer. > > > > Best Regards > > Eric > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > >
