On Wed, 21 Apr 2021, 21:28 Ernie Rael, <[email protected]> wrote: > > So in your humble (ie non-lawyer) opinion, you might change your vote if > someone (not necessarily from Oracle) made an unambiguous statement in > the artifact that all the files are CPE. (vote reference independent of > any technical issues) >
Currently it needs to be unambiguous and in the Oracle repo. But, if we can actually distribute then I would certainly vote differently. I opened that ticket because I want to see us able to ship with nb-javac .. obviously! > And the question I was referring too (and too bad about the double > negative) > > Roman Shaposhnik and Roy T. Fielding, does it help that all the > files making up nb-javac, when scanned for CPE, only the files that > will not end up in the JAR are not covered by CPE: > That question was answered given that was the original ticket question! Neil >
