On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 15:52, Michael Bien <mbie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 06.01.22 16:38, Neil C Smith wrote: > > ## Priorities > > > > priority:critical > > priority:high > > > > I'm only thinking of adding those two for now. With critical reserved > > for "must address in next release" issues / PRs. Rather than low > > priority, maybe we can add a contribution-welcome or similar? > > > I think there should be a low priority. There are little annoyances or > "quality of life" issues which should not be set to high prio. (which > would happen if there is no other choice) > > contribution-welcome: could this be a label?
Bear in mind, the default would be no priority label. We only need to put a priority label on an issue where there's a need to track it. My thinking was that there's a need to mark things that are lower than normal priority where we are basically saying we would accept a fix, but it's unlikely someone here is going to do it any time soon - ie. encouraging the reporter or others who do consider it a priority to work on it? So yes, "contribution-welcome" was suggested as a label. It seemed a little friendlier than telling someone their issue isn't important to us! :-) That reminds me that Geertjan and I had a conversation a while back about the little annoyances that are quick fixes being labelled "papercuts" along the lines of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/One%20Hundred%20Papercuts/Mission Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
