I never shall use my smartphone with it's crude auto correction.
That's what I posted:
And, Mandy Apache projects rising xy.apache.org <http://xy.apache.org>
sie their specific Main website, too.
And, that's what I originally wrote:
And, many Apache projects using xy.apache.org <http://xy.apache.org>
have their specific Main website, too.
Herzliche Grüße - Best Regards,
Michael Müller
Brühl, Germany
blog.mueller-bruehl.de <http://blog.mueller-bruehl.de/>
it-rezension.de <http://it-rezension.de/>
@muellermi
Read my books
"Web Development with Java and JSF": https://leanpub.com/jsf
"Java Lambdas and Parallel Streams":
http://www.apress.com/de/book/9781484224861
"Visitors" a photographic image book: https://leanpub.com/visitors
On 05/14/2017 11:43 AM, Michael Müller wrote:
My Two pence:
Netbeans.com <http://Netbeans.com> would indicate closed Source,
whilst Netbeans.org <http://Netbeans.org> Stands for Open Source.
Thus, a second Emililan's proposal. And, Mandy Apache projects rising
xy.apache.org <http://xy.apache.org> sie their specific Main website, too.
Am 14. Mai 2017 10:00:58 MESZ schrieb Emilian Bold
<[email protected]>:
I see little gain in usingnetbeans.apache.org <http://netbeans.apache.org>
vsnetbeans.org <http://netbeans.org>. The previous site is well known and we can
promote our Apache future in many other ways.
The split seems logical: users vs dev.
There's no data to imply a general perception of a "closed" project that
doesn't need participation. NetBeans has been an open source project for a decade or two
already!
Thenetbeans.apache.org <http://netbeans.apache.org> domain is an Apache demand.
I would actually make redirects the other way around, by keepingnetbeans.org
<http://netbeans.org> as the main site.
--emi
Pe 14 mai 2017, la 09:35, Ognyan Kulev <[email protected]> a scris:
Dear all, I think it's better to have single
netbeans.apache.org <http://netbeans.apache.org>. There are no
technical obstacles for redirecting from netbeans.org
<http://netbeans.org>. It's true that netbeans.org
<http://netbeans.org> is the name that people know but this is
also the name that people connect to corporate-developed
NetBeans. Having netbeans.apache.org
<http://netbeans.apache.org> as primary website will send a
message that NetBeans is now an open community that welcomes
participation by Apache rules. If netbeans.org
<http://netbeans.org> is left as marketing and consumer
website, this leaves the impression that we produce quality
product in the same "closed" process as before (although AFAIK
it is not entirely true for the nowadays NetBeans) and
NetBeans don't need participation in its development. I added
the following to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=69408938
: * There are no technical obstacles to keeping all
netbeans.org <http://netbeans.org> links perfectly working by
using redirection. * Single netbeans.apache.org
<http://netbeans.apache.org> will send clear message that
NetBeans is open community that welcomes development
involvement. It is also "cutting of ties" with the perception
of the previous "corporate model". * There will always be some
confusion why there is such split. * OpenOffice.org
<http://OpenOffice.org> is not a good example for splitting
because the name of the software is "OpenOffice.org
<http://OpenOffice.org>" so they have to keep it. Also, OOo is
consumer software so it's not expected that users will
participate in its development. * Example of using the old
domain is groovy-lang.org <http://groovy-lang.org> but they
decided to not use groovy.apache.org
<http://groovy.apache.org> at all, so again it's single domain
for the project and no split. Best regards, Ognyan
Herzliche Grüße - Best Regards,
Michael Müller
Brühl, Germany
blog.mueller-bruehl.de <http://blog.mueller-bruehl.de>
it-rezension.de <http://it-rezension.de>
@muellermi
Read my books
"Web Development with Java and JSF": https://leanpub.com/jsf
"Java Lambdas and Parallel Streams":
http://www.apress.com/de/book/9781484224861
"Visitors" a photographic image book: https://leanpub.com/visitors
