So our bandwidth requirements are not a problem? I was under the impression they are quite large and we need to find solutions.
Of course, I would prefer we use the existing mirrors. --emi On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:21 AM, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/03/2017 11:15 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I received a while back permission to mirror some NetBeans binaries ( > > http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries and such) on the Oregon State University > > Open Source Lab (OSUOSL) infrastructure (http://osuosl.org/ ). > > Standard practice is to use the Apache mirror system ( > http://www.apache.org/mirrors/ ) which is split across 250+ servers > around the world. If there is need for much more bandwidth (80TB/250 == > 300GB/month per server, not that much), we can set up some dedicated > machines to handle this, but I'd suggest we wait and see what happens. > > > > > Back then it was not a very demanding request in terms of storage or > > bandwidth. > > > > I have now approached OSUOSL (ticket #29524) to see if we could use their > > servers for the 80TB/month downloads we would need under Apache. > > > > They have been cordial but very slow in answering tickets in the past. > This > > new ticket will probably be answered in a week or so. (It would help if > we > > could get a more direct contact with them). > > > > Tom Wheeler mentioned long ago that OSUOSL used to be a NetBeans mirror > > back when NetBeans had mirrors. Perhaps they want to support us again. > > > > --emi > > > >
