Well, problem solved then!

--emi

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 06/03/2017 11:23 PM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> > So our bandwidth requirements are not a problem? I was under the
> impression
> > they are quite large and we need to find solutions.
> >
> > Of course, I would prefer we use the existing mirrors.
>
> If need be, we can set up a dedicated box or two for this. 80TB on our
> own boxes would cost us around $100/month, it's not the end of the world
> really. But I think the mirror system will suffice. As said, let's try
> it and see if it works out :)
>
> >
> >
> > --emi
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:21 AM, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/03/2017 11:15 PM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I received a while back permission to mirror some NetBeans binaries (
> >>> http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries and such) on the Oregon State
> University
> >>> Open Source Lab (OSUOSL) infrastructure (http://osuosl.org/ ).
> >>
> >> Standard practice is to use the Apache mirror system (
> >> http://www.apache.org/mirrors/ ) which is split across 250+ servers
> >> around the world. If there is need for much more bandwidth (80TB/250 ==
> >> 300GB/month per server, not that much), we can set up some dedicated
> >> machines to handle this, but I'd suggest we wait and see what happens.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Back then it was not a very demanding request in terms of storage or
> >>> bandwidth.
> >>>
> >>> I have now approached OSUOSL (ticket #29524) to see if we could use
> their
> >>> servers for the 80TB/month downloads we would need under Apache.
> >>>
> >>> They have been cordial but very slow in answering tickets in the past.
> >> This
> >>> new ticket will probably be answered in a week or so. (It would help if
> >> we
> >>> could get a more direct contact with them).
> >>>
> >>> Tom Wheeler mentioned long ago that OSUOSL used to be a NetBeans mirror
> >>> back when NetBeans had mirrors. Perhaps they want to support us again.
> >>>
> >>> --emi
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to