On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Antonio <anto...@vieiro.net> wrote:
> +1 as well.
>
> El 12/12/17 a las 19:20, Jan Lahoda escribió:
>
>> [...]
>> Are there any comments/objections/help offers to this proposal?
>>
>
> I'll have some spare time during this week and the next. But I'll need
> some clear goals/instructions to be effective.
>
Thanks. For now, if you would have time to look at the
VerifyLibsAndLicenses/testLicenseFilesAreProperlyFormattedPhysically and
VerifyLibsAndLicenses/testBinaryUniqueness, that would help I think (should
be easy to do - either disable the check for
testLicenseFilesAreProperlyFormattedPhysically or strip the trailing
whitespaces; whitelist the binaries in testBinaryUniqueness). Besides that,
we should do both source and binary IDE builds and look at
LICENSE/NOTICE/DEPENDENCIES/README in both to see what needs to be
improved/fixed. I hope to get to the javac stuff tomorrow, I'll see what it
takes.
Thanks,
Jan
>
> Cheers,
> Antonio
>
