On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 at 19:03 Emilian Bold <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think a static site and a wiki are somewhat orthogonal things. > > I believe even the old wiki needed a login for edit. > Yes, and so would this - the two options are for committers to have direct edit and other people with GitHub accounts to PR, or for everyone with a GitHub account able to edit. Personally, I'd prefer the latter. Using a GitHub PR /might/ be good enough for the technical articles. > Surely that just complicates the process while still relying just as much on GitHub infrastructure? Taking a definition of Wiki from Wikipedia (aaargh! ;-) ) "A wiki is a website on which users collaboratively modify content and structure directly from the web browser". The other option is we migrate the existing content to the static site and stop calling it a wiki - I just think there are pros to having a wiki in terms of a low barrier to getting involved with the project. Anyway, I'll step back for a bit and let others chime in - you know where my vote is! :-) Best wishes, Neil -- Neil C Smith Artist & Technologist www.neilcsmith.net Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org
