Oooo ... nice. Thank you, Emilian -- Johnny Muczynski 734-262-2045
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 7:21 AM Emilian Bold <[email protected]> wrote: > > A format-on-save setting would be helpful. > > Tools -> Options -> Editor -> On Save > > --emi > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On 16 March 2018 1:02 PM, John Muczynski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The product I'm working on at work is using NetBeans as the coding > standard. > > > > Last year, I was able to apply the formatter on all the files in the > project, and then commit. That helped make diffs readable. A > format-on-save setting would be helpful. > > > > On Mar 16, 2018 6:47 AM, "Emilian Bold" <[email protected]\> > wrote: > > > > > \> Rather than discussing the actual conventions, make sure the IDE > can read and apply settings from Eclipse easily and exactly. > > > > > > Not sure what this means. Just make sure plugins are able to format > the code? > > > > > > Still, NetBeans does provide formatting and coding hints. Both should > follow /something/ and I assume Wade was wondering what standard to follow. > > > > > > My angle is that NetBeans, just like Eclipse, \*is\* a de-facto > standard. > > > > > > --emi > > > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > > > > > On 16 March 2018 6:10 AM, Jaroslav Tulach <[email protected]\> > wrote: > > > > > > \> Here is my user comment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > \> My colleagues at OracleLabs integrated Eclipse formatter into our > continuous build. As far as I know it is the only formatter that works in > headless mode and is sort of standardized and a bit stable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > \> As it is annoying to always reformat from command line, I > integrated Benny's excellent formatter > http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/70382/eclipse-java-code-formatter-eclipse-neon-4-6-1a > into our NetBeans projects. > > > > > > > > > > > > > \> Rather than discussing the actual conventions, make sure the IDE > can read and apply settings from Eclipse easily and exactly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > \> My 2 Kč. > > > > > > > > > > > > > \> -jt > > > > > > > > > > > > > \> 14\\. 3. 2018 v 8:22, Emilian Bold [email protected]: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > \> The coding conventions NetBeans follows and provides are "as-is". > People that what to customize it have some options to toggle or could use > 3rd party plugins. > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > \> Particularly since there is no global Java standard I don't > believe we should be looking for extra work for nothing. For reference, the > Google Java Style Guide is rather good. > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > \> Which standardised coding conventions do the Eclipse and IntelliJ > IDEs follow? > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > \> --emi > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > \> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> On 12 March 2018 7:25 PM, Wade Chandler [email protected] > wrote: > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> I noticed that Oracle has not maintained a convention for the > Java language like other groups have for their ecosystems. This also has > not materialized from OpenJDK: > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/codeconvtoc-136057.html > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/codeconvtoc-136057.html > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> http://openjdk.java.net/guide/codeConventions.html > http://openjdk.java.net/guide/codeConventions.html > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Style+Rules > https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Style+Rules > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alundblad/styleguide/index-v6.html > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alundblad/styleguide/index-v6.html > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> Contrast this to: > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/ > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/ > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-guide/inside-a-program/coding-conventions > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-guide/inside-a-program/coding-conventions > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> So, it just seems wrong to follow those links; the Java > conventions were a great example for years. I think the Google ones seem > reasonable myself unless we or others in the Java community take that up: > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html > https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> Any thoughts or other information? Am I missing something? > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> Thanks, > > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > > \> Wade > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > \> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [email protected] > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > \> For additional commands, e-mail: > [email protected] > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > \> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > > > > > \> > > > > > > > > \> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > \-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [email protected] > > > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists >
