On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Laszlo Kishalmi <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Well,
>
> I'm trying to collect the remaining things to do for 9.0 release



There are 3 blockers:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12343308

Thanks,

Gj





> for a week now, from GitHub PR-s, JIRA and this mailing list. Regarding
> 9.0 in numbers are the following (none may be accurate, though):
>
> We have 31 open PR-s in GitHub (not necessary 9.0 related)
>
> We have 44 open issues with PR-s.
>
> We have 32 open issues marked for 9.0
>
> We also have 5 open issues with PR-s for 9.0
>
> The issues and PRs are not really aligned.
>
> Well this does not necessarily means that we should not branch for
> release. I just would like to say, we probably need to be more focused on
> what we are doing.
>
> I could promise to go over the open issues and the PR-s and close those
> which have merged PRs-.
>
> Also I feel the number of open PRs is quite high, though it might really
> mean that changes that we do not want to include into 9.0 are piling up
> (indicates the need of the release branch).
>
> Also those 5 issues with PR-s might just go into master in the following
> days and we could make the release branch after that.
>
> So If I would vote for release branch now it would be 0/-1 right now as we
> (or maybe just me) can't really see clearly on 9.0.
>
>
>
> On 04/17/2018 05:52 AM, Neil C Smith wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 12:10 Jaroslav Tulach <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, there are changes in the queue for the master branch that could be
>>> too destabilizing. To avoid something like that to negatively influence
>>> the
>>> 9.0 release, I'd suggest to create a branch release/9.0 and put only the
>>> safe fixes ready for 9.0 there. The wild development would continue in
>>> the
>>> master branch.
>>>
>>> +1 to branching and that.  Longer term perhaps a more gitflow-like system
>> where PR's come into a develop branch too?
>>
>>   A question, though - I assume this will branch off master now, not from
>> the beta tag?  Given that in NetCAT we were testing the beta, I assume
>> there is nothing you'd consider "too destabilizing"  between then and now?
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Neil
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to