On Tue, 22 May 2018 09:29:29 -0400 Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@protonmail.ch> wrote:
> > I take it there will be an official rc1 after the rc1-rc1 for > > voting? > > No, this is *the* RC1. But if it doesn't pass voting there is still > no 'public' RC1 and we can't just make a public RC2 without a public > RC1. Ok just trying to determine if I should version bump my packages, Gentoo ebuilds. I guess maybe I should to help see if I run into odd build issues from source. > So, internally it's RC1-vote1 (aka RC1-rc1), RC1-vote2 (aka RC1-rc2) > until we get it right. > > Publicly it's going to be just -RC1. > > This rc1-rc1 naming is a bit odd. I think RC1-attemp1 or RC1-vote1 or > something else would be better. Yes its odd, and that -attempt1 or vote1 would make it more clear. But with changes to that, I think you end up with a RC2. Maybe no need for the suffix just stick with RC. I think most people know a RC is that, and not an actual final release. -- William L. Thomson Jr.
pgpWqUFFKfWR6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
