This mirrors my view of Microsoft 100%… their “success" held back the computer 
industry by about 10 years.
I remember my fancy multitasking Commodore Amiga with sound and colour and GUI 
and a decent processor architecture… while MS and PCs had DOS and segmented 
memory, ugh.

They have a track record of ruining nearly everything they touch.

Regarding GitHub, I vastly prefer Mercurial anyway, so I’ve never been a GitHub 
fan.  (In the end it doesn’t much matter though, it’s just betamax is better 
than VHS all over again…)

Cheers,

Scott

> On Jun 6, 2018, at 3:46 AM, Tim Boudreau <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Honestly, when I think of Microsoft, I think of the immeasurable harm they
> did to progress in computing.  There was going to be a PC on every desktop
> regardless.  They just ensured that PC ran a horrifically flawed,
> vulnerable, broken by design OS.  Convenient as it is, I think you can
> trace a big chunk of the rapid explosion of mobile computing to people
> using a non-windows device for the first time and thinking "OMG, you mean
> viruses, malware, ransomware, antivirus software that spies on you and blue
> screens of death aren't the way all computing *simply **is*?  You mean that
> isn't *normal*?!"  How much further along would pretty well *everything* be
> if millions hadn't been trapped in a world of 32 bits, synchronous I/O,
> backdoors, wide-open OS-wide configuration databases, never mind it being a
> black box, for an extra decade?

Reply via email to