Just so everyone knows how semver works (especially semver 2), and if we were to need a bigger convo, we can start another thread (just putting out info for now):
https://semver.org/ <https://semver.org/> > On Jun 21, 2018, at 6:58 AM, Wade Chandler <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why not semantic versioning? Asking as it takes care of different meta info > such as what we are discussing, and it is quickly becoming an OSS defacto > standard from what I can tell anecdotally. > > Thanks, > > Wade > >> On Jun 21, 2018, at 6:06 AM, Neil C Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 10:51, Geertjan Wielenga >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> But, from my point of view, anything is fine, e.g., candidate-1, >>> candidate-2, etc. >> >> Yes, or -vote1?! But something that isn't -rc1 anyway. In fact, >> perhaps a tagging / naming strategy that deliberately doesn't look >> like semantic versioning would be a good idea? >
